1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uysha [10]
3 years ago
11

Why was the united states justified in going to war with mexico

History
1 answer:
never [62]3 years ago
4 0

En gran parte por la ideología del destino manifiesto. Esta doctrina causó que muchos ciudadanos Estadounidenses vieran a México (y al resto de Latinoamérica) como uno de aquellos que la “providencia” les había “permitido” subyugar.

Texas, colonia mexicana poblada por Anglos bajo invitación a su fundador,  Stephen Austin  (de hecho el permiso de asentamiento de Austin fué cedido por el virreinato Español a su padre, y el gobierno mexicano independiente eventualmente le permitió asentarse validando el permiso como una herencia ), hubo una guerra de independencia por varias razones, incluidas en estas la mano dura del gobierno mexicano, la confusión gubernamental del periodo independiente y el hecho de que los <span>anglos sureños y terratenientes</span>

You might be interested in
History of English;Summery project
Mariana [72]

Answer:

What exactly is the question?

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is not true of the Muslims?
fgiga [73]

Answer: Where are the options?

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answered
kakasveta [241]

Answer:

option a is the correct answer

5 0
3 years ago
1I.n the novel, Douglass makes two trips to England. How did both trips aid in preserving Douglass’ status as a “free man”?
Aliun [14]

Answer:

hmm I dont know that one  

Explanation:

AND WHY YALL ON BRAINLY

5 0
2 years ago
If a president were to declare a “ hands off” policy, what do you think he might be describing
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

Hands off policy would be described as the policy that means not intervening in matters.

If a president has announced an off hands policy in some matter, that means he has declared that he will not intervene in that matter under any circumstance. He would have nothing to do with it and nobody shall try to have him indulged in that matter.

I hope the answer was helpful.

Thanks for asking.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Puente Hills Reserve was initially founded as part of the mitigation process for which major infrastructure project? Select
    8·1 answer
  • What is a quaker and what impact did this group have on the establishment of Pennsylvania
    9·1 answer
  • Somebody please help
    7·1 answer
  • New Industrial centers which resource is most common across the country
    12·2 answers
  • What was the MOST LIKELY reason for Oppenheimer's reaction to the Trinity test?
    15·1 answer
  • Unit 3 byzantine empire exam study guide
    13·1 answer
  • Please help!
    5·2 answers
  • Someone plz help I need to retake my quiz
    5·1 answer
  • 3. After the Battles of Shiloh and Antietam
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the government protect big business rather than protect common people?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!