Simon decides to travel to the mountain and look into the face of the beast.
Hello There!
The reader may not get the perspectives of the other characters.
Because the text is in third person limited, it would only show the perspective of a single character. However, if it were third person omniscient, all character's perspectives would be shown.
The summary being spoken of is culled from this passage;
- As a result of a volcanic eruption, Enkai and the cattle were thrown into the sky. Enkai wanted to save his cattle. He grew a tree that bridged the sky and the earth. The cattle walked down the tree to Neiterkob. Neiterkob and the Maasai tribe took over caring for the cattle.
This summary ought to be revised because;
- C. The summary lacks transitions that connect ideas.
In the passage above, we see a summary that lacks cohesion and structure because of the lack of transitions at the beginning of sentences.
Transition words make sentences easy to read because they link up ideas. Examples of transition words are, however, since, but, though, etc.
The above summary lacks these transition words that connect ideas. Therefore it has to be revised for better comprehension.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/18561416
What book? There are many different books named ambush.
Do you mean Tim O'Brien
The second point in the paragraph about children provides more support for the overall topic: noise pollution. because it's offering more evidence that noise pollution is an issue, "furthermore" is your best choice as a transition. "for instance" would suggest that you're giving an example of something, as in a specific case in which a child's education suffered. "however" suggests a shift, usually describing an exception, and the point of the children's education is not an exception--it's further evidence. "consequently" suggests that you'd carry on to tell the reader about an effect of a circumstance.
