Conduct independent research to find a source that gives an opinion on either supporting or rejecting Syrian refugees.

1 answer:

8 0

Many believe history repeats itself. This rationale often leads historians and others to draw parallels between current events and the past. Throughout your history courses, you have used past events to form arguments, conclusions, and generalizations. It is important to recognize, however, that, simply because someone makes such a connection and uses facts to support it, it doesn’t mean that it is correct or accurate. The ability to distinguish between sound generalizations and misleading oversimplifications is an important skill.

You might be interested in

If an expense is paid with cash assets will decrease. retained earnings will increase. liabilities will increase. expenses will

irakobra [83]

<u>Answer: </u>

If an expense is paid with cash the assets will decrease.

<u>Explanation: </u>

As long as cash is termed as a current asset, its flowing out of the business would be considered as a decrease in the assets.
Though it is a conventional practice to pay for expenses in cash, it has to be taken into consideration that the assets of the business are decreasing with such payments done.
But as cash is a highly fluid asset, its inflow and outflow do not bother the business much.

3 0

3 years ago

Overriding desires that drive how we live our lives are called select one:

Andrew [12]

They are called self-values

3 0

3 years ago

Which is an action is an example of periodization?

Leto [7]

hope this helps

Explanation:

organizing the history of Mexico into three distinct units of time. Which action is an example of periodization? A historian writes a book in which she organizes the history of Europe into these units: the Middle Ages, the Enlightenment, and the Renaissance.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Nationalism

goldfiish [28.3K]

D. always leads to war

7 0

3 years ago

In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that people encouraging young men to dodge the draft could be imprisoned fo

spayn [35]

Answer:

TRUE

Explanation:

In the Schenck v. United States case, the US Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented a clear and present danger to society. Because of that, freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the government could restrict speech if the the words mean a clear and present danger to society.

3 0

3 years ago