Globalization in essence is companies and governments climbing onto the world stage and interacting internationally.
Globalization has helped some, but it has also hurt a lot, specifically through:
- Making the rich richer
- Removing trade barriers only for new ones to rise (VAT taxes, etc.)
- Increased trade deficits with many jobs leaving their developed nations for less developed ones (U.S. manufacturing to China, etc.)
- Developed country job pay cuts
- MNC's leaving countries and exploiting international tax havens
- MNC's overseeing bad work conditions in countries with less regulations
- MNC's influencing international politics
- Exploitation of labor
- Social welfare schemes
Et cetera, et cetera...
All the problems we hear about with companies leaving their countries and stranding thousands if not millions of people without jobs, and labor issues in other countries all stem from globalization. So we need to decide if the benefits outweigh the costs here or not...
Answer: HOPE THIS HELPED! :D ;P
Stratified
Explanation:
Option B. The type of bias that the statement of the author could be classified under is bias by labeling.
<h3>What is bias by labeling?</h3>
This is the type of bias that is known to occur whereby a label would be attached to a particular group but the other group would be free from such.
This is the type of bias that has been presented in this question about these phones.
Read more on bias here:
brainly.com/question/24491228
#SPJ1
Essentially they represented the King and his opinions/ values, they made recommendations that they thought the King would approve of.
Answer:
(A). To change the system so that it affords the peasant the least disadvantage.
Explanation:
