1. Before watching the film, I understood that the war on drugs and war on crime were attempts by the government to stop the illegal consumption and distribution of hard drugs that endangered the lives of the youths, whether they were Whites or people of color.
2. I was surprised to learn that the legislative policies and the active role that the state played in criminalizing and deliberately targeting communities of color had racial underpinnings. Who could have imagined racial hatred drove all the governmental efforts against criminality?
After all, drug dealing and other forms of criminality have not helped people of color in any positive way. They have cut short the aspirations of many. Somebody like Robert DeShaun Peter lost his brilliant future and life in such acts.
3. The immediate reaction was that governmental powers should never be used to <em>malign a race</em>. While drugs and crimes have not helped the youths in making societal progress, the <em>war against drugs and crimes</em> should not be against the black race but criminality.
Thus, such partial wars targeting a racial community were not necessary. <em>Wars against illicit drugs and crimes</em> should be waged holistically for corrective effects and <em>not internalize hatred.</em>
Learn more: brainly.com/question/15702214
Answer:
They were forced to move out from their ancestral land.
Explanation:
The American-Indian war occurred because the government of the settlers wanted to take ownership over the resources that resided Within the Native's ancestral land.
Since the land was tied to their ancestral history and cultural origin, the Native refuse to give it. So, both parties engaged in the battle.
The technological advancement that's possessed by the settlers made the tide of war turn in their favor. As a result, the native Americans were forcefully removed from their home and scattered all across North America.
Allowed to practice their own faiths, but forced to play additional taxes
