Answer:
The answer to the question is;
Yes, it is very significant as the number of of observed vaccinated children is below the number of actually vaccinated children by 78.
Step-by-step explanation:
The result of the survey of more than 13,000 children indicate that only 89.4 % had actually been and the P-value indicate that the chance of having a sample proportion of 89.4 % vaccinated is 1.1 %.
P is low at 0.011 for which however the proportion of those vaccinated is between 0.889 and 0.899 using a 95% confidence interval, whereby the decrease from 90 % believed to 89.9 % is small, albeit it depends on the size of the population.
At 89.4 %, in a sample of 13,000, the number of children expected to have been vaccinated but were missed is equal to 90 - 89.4 = 0.6 % = 0.006
Therefore the children missed = 78 children which is significant.
For this case we have that by definition, a linear function is of the form
We have the following options:
A) 
Rewriting:
It's a quadratic function!
B) 
Rewriting:
It's a linear function!
C)
Rewriting:
It's a cubic function.
D) 
Rewriting:
It's a quadratic function!
E)
Rewriting:
It's a cubic function!
Answer:
The linear function is option B
Answer:
RQ = 9.
Step-by-step explanation:
m < RPQ = 180 - 90 - 75 = 15 degrees
m < PQM = 75 - 60 = 15 degrees.
So triangle PMQ is isosceles so side PM is congruent to side MQ, therefore MQ = 18.
Triangle RQM is a 30-60-90 triangle with RQ the shortest leg (because it is opposite the lowest angle) so that makes RQ = 1/2 of MQ. (The sides in a 30-60-90 triangle are in the ratio 1:sqrt3:2)
RQ = 1/2 * 18 = 9.
