Answer my question I’ve posted it 5 times plz
Answer:
she didnt really
Explanation:
it took a whole community, not one person :/
Answer:
They fought for the land so they could live in it, not so they could give it to the Native Americans (whom which the colonists didnt like so much back then)
Explanation:
The early stages of the roman-republic consisted of three branches. <span>The ancient Roman republic had three branches of government. In the beginning, the </span>legislative<span>branch was the Senate, a group made up of 300 citizens from Rome's patrician class, the oldest and wealthiest families of Rome. It was the patricians, tired of obeying the king, who revolted and threw out Tarquinius Superbus. The Senate was the most powerful branch of the Roman republic, and senators held the position for life. The </span>executive<span> branch was made up of two consuls, elected yearly. These two consuls had almost kingly powers, and each could veto, or disapprove of the other's decision. It is quite possible that the idea of two consuls came from Sparta with its two kings. Praetors were part of the </span>judicial<span> branch, they were elected yearly by the people of Rome, and acted as judges. Hope this helps, and if your feeling generous feel free to leave a rate, thanks and a brainliest it would help me reach expert and I would greatly appreciate it ;)</span>
Kipling believed in the worthy course of imperialism. He saw the fruits it would bring such as civilization,and enumerated that imperialism was thus long called for.He however felt it was burdensome to extend rule on other lands as it imposed heavy strains on the imperialist. he concluded nevertheless that it was the West burden,and worthy course.
