1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
podryga [215]
3 years ago
13

Marco and Fred enter into a contract for the sale of Marco's apartment for which Fred agrees to pay him $100,000. Marco cannot p

rohibit Fred from transferring his right to the ownership of the apartment because such a prohibition is:
a. ​unconscionable.

b. ​against public policy.

c. ​immoral.

d. ​a crime.
Business
1 answer:
VLD [36.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is the option A: unconscionable

Explanation:

To begin with, the reason why such prohibition from Marco to Fred is unconscionable is due to the fact that Marco already stated in a private contract that he agreed to sell the apartment to Fred by a certain price, therefore establishing that the property of the real estate now belongs to the other party, letting everyone else external to the contract know that the proper and new owner is Fred.

Secondly, it is understandable that now that Fred is the new owner of the apartment by contract then it is unfair and unreasonable that the old owner Marco prohibits him to do what he wants with the apartment.

You might be interested in
Bower Company purchased Lark Corporation’s net assets on January 3, 20X2, for $632,000 cash. In addition, Bower incurred $9,000
Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

<em>Preparation of Journal Entries</em>

<u>Date                      Particulars                                  Dr($)                Cr($</u>)

January 3, 20x2      Cash & Receivables              57,000

                                 Inventory                                165,000

                                Buildings & Equipment           307,000

                                Patent                                       203,000

                                Account Payable                                               20,000                                                

                                Purchase Consideration                                    632,000                                                                  

                               Gain on Purchase Bargain                                  80,000                                

                              <em> (Being purchase of Lark</em>

<em>                                Corporation`s net assets)                                                                      </em>

<em />

<em>Recording of merger costs.</em>

(Debit)  Cash                                                             $9,000

(Credit)  Merger Expenses                                       $9,000

Recording of acquisition of Lark Corporation`s net assets

(Debit)  Investment in Lark`s net asset                    $712,000

(Credit)   Cash                                                            $632,000

(Credit)  Gain on Purchase Bargain                          $80,000

<em />

Explanation:

When acquiring another business, net asset (Total Assets - Total Liabilities) is valued at fair value (sometimes called market value, not book value.  Hence, the reason why the fair value of Lark`s assets and liabilities was used in the calculation above. So the net assets  ($57,000+$165,000+$307,000+$203,000 - $20,000) = $712,000.

After, calculating the net assets of the Lark, the purchase consideration given by Bower Company has to be removed from the net asset, in order to get the goodwill or gain on purchase bargain on the acquisition. The formula is Purchase consideration - Net assets of the target company = Goodwill (Gain on purchase bargain). If the purchase consideration is higher than the net assets, then goodwill is obtained. If the purchase consideration is lower than net assets acquired then, gain on purchase bargain is obtained.

In Bower`s case, gain on purchase bargain is obtained because net assets is  greater than purchase consideration ($632,000 - $712,000).

<em>Merger cost</em>

Merger cost is not considered as part of purchase consideration. The merger cost is taken to income statement of Bower Corporation as expense.

3 0
3 years ago
The U.S. experience of strong economic growth, full employment, and price stability in the late 1990s and early 2000s can be exp
vodomira [7]

Answer:

b. rightward shift of aggregate demand and a leftward shift of aggregate supply.

Explanation:

The U.S. experience of strong economic growth, full employment, and price stability in the late 1990s and early 2000s can be explained by a rightward shift of aggregate demand and a leftward shift of aggregate supply.

The rightward shift of aggregate demand is as a result of strong economic growth and price stability.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In most cases, the law requires that you have an emission test every two years at the time of registration or at time of sale.
dsp73

Answer:

A) true

Explanation:

This requirement applies mostly to used cars. Some states do not require emissions inspections for vehicles that are less than 4 or 6 years old (depends on the state, e.g. Arizona's threshold is 6 years). Other states also allow certain old vehicles to not pass emissions inspections (e.g. Massachusetts does not requires vehicles over 15 years old to pass emissions inspections).

Those vehicles that do not pass the emissions inspections will not be registered by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), that means they will not receive a license plate so it is illegal to drive them.

4 0
3 years ago
Inc. (WFI). After liquidating its remaining inventory and paying off its remaining liabilities, WFI had the following tax accoun
Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

On the transfer of the building,

Appreciation of building = FMV - Adjusted Basis

                                        = $50,000 - $10,000

                                        = $40,000

WFI has taxable transaction and gain recognition of $40,000.

On the transfer of the land,

Appreciation of land = FMV - Adjusted Basis

                                  = $150,000 - $90,000

                                  = $60,000

WFI has taxable transaction and gain recognition of $60,000.

5 0
3 years ago
Employers must withhold from your paycheck
vladimir2022 [97]
The answer is number 2 good luck
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The management of Nebraska Corporation is considering the purchase of a new machine costing $490,000. The company's desired rate
    8·1 answer
  • Holding all other things constant, when the price level rises, interest rates:
    7·1 answer
  • Opunui Corporation has two manufacturing departments--Molding and Finishing. The company used the following data at the beginnin
    12·1 answer
  • Even though the procedure called for you to do so, organic chemists typically do not weigh sodium sulfate when it is used for th
    8·1 answer
  • Toby and Keith are planning to create and jointly own a company that will license their patented technology solely for royalties
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not true of taxable asset purchases?
    10·1 answer
  • Heedy Company is trying to decide how many units of merchandise to produce each month.The company policy is to have 20% of the n
    7·1 answer
  • Hammes Corporation manufactures and sells a single product. The company uses units as the measure of activity in its budgets and
    7·1 answer
  • Một người tiêu dùng có thu nhập I = 10.000 ngàn đồng/tháng để mua 2 hàng hóa X và Y. Giá của hàng hóa X là Px = 20 ngàn đồng/kg
    8·1 answer
  • The demand for ski rentals falls when the price of lift tickets increases. This is an example of?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!