Answer:
The price of a 6-month call option on C.A.L.L. stock is $13.52
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
P = Price of 6-months put option=$10.50.
So = Current price=$125
X = Exrecise price=$125
r = Risk free interest rate= 5%
T = Time 6 months = 1/2
In order to calculate the price of a 6-month call option on C.A.L.L. stock at an exercise price of $125 if it is at the money, we would have to use the formula of put-call parity as follows:
C=P+So- (<u> X )</u>
( 1+r)∧T
C=$10.50+$125-(<u>$125 )</u>
(1+0.05)∧1/2
C=$135.5-121.98
C=$13.52
The price of a 6-month call option on C.A.L.L. stock is $13.52
Answer:
a. 1
Explanation:
Rules-based monetary policy advocats would most likely set the annual money supply growth rate at 1%. The money supply refers to the total value of money that is available in an economy at a particular point in time. This usually includes currency in circulation as well as demand deposits. However, the exact definition of "money supply" can vary depending on the central bank that manages it.
As an economy moves into a recessionary period, examples of fiscal policies that act as automatic stabilizers include an increase in transfer payments.
Monetary increase refers to a boom in the size of a country's economy over a period of time. the scale of an economic system is commonly measured by the entire manufacturing of products and services inside the financial system, which is called gross home product (GDP). the financial increase may be measured in 'nominal' or 'real' terms.
The financial increase is a growth in the manufacturing of goods and offerings in a financial system. increases in capital goods, labor force, generation, and human capital can all contribute to the monetary increase.
Learn more about economic increase here:brainly.com/question/1690575
#SPJ4
Answer:
No, we can’t say
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to decide if we can say that Guatemala’s standard of living grew more than that of the US’ standard of living between the years 1993 and 2003 given the pointers in the question.
We cannot say that this is correct because of the following reasons;
As observed from the question, the US growth rate was calculated between the years 1948-2003, which is indicative of a 55 year span. Now, comparing this with that of Guatemala, we can see that the span here is just 10 years I.e from 1993 to 2003.
Also, we were not provided with the population growth rate in both countries and this makes it difficult to judge which of the two countries have a better growth in terms of standard of living
