Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

13

Miguel runs 6 miles in 55 minutes. At the same rate, how many miles would he run in 44 minutes

2 answers:

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]2 years ago

8 0

You can write this in a proportion way: 6/55 = x/44.
Multiply both sides by 11 to get rid of the 55 and 44: 6/5 = x/4
Now, multiply both sides by 20: 5x = 24. x = 4.8

Therefore, he can run 4.8 miles in 44 minutes.

VladimirAG [237]2 years ago

8 0

Speed = Distance/Time 6/55
Distance = Speed × Time
6/55 × 44

4.8 miles

You might be interested in

Simplify. (-5.12) - (-4.7) (7.021)

aksik [14]

First, you should do the product first:
(-4.7)* (7.021)= -32.9987

Then, let's do the subtraction:
(-5.12)- (-32.9987)
= (-5.12)+ 32.9987
= 27.8787

Final answer: 27.8787

Hope this would help~

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How many triangles can be formed

Nastasia [14]

Answer:

B. One

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the two angles are already given, the value of the third angle is already fixed. The third angle can be found by the sum of both angles subtracted from 180. Since 2 angles and lengths are already given, there can only be 1 triangle.

Hope this helps!

If not, I am sorry.

6 0

1 year ago

A weatherman stated that the average temperature during July in Chattanooga is 80 degrees or less. A sample of 32 Julys is taken

MrMuchimi

Answer:

u <= 80

u > 80

Step-by-step explanation:

The happiest would be

Null hypothesis: u <= 80

Alternative hypothesis: u > 80

6 0

2 years ago

Two angles are supplementary if their sun is 180. The larger angle measures five degrees more than four times the measures of a

Jet001 [13]

Answer:

The smaller angle is 35 and the larger one is 145.

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find this, we need to express the larger angle in terms of the smaller angle (x).

4x + 5 = large angle.

Now that we have this, we can add them together and set equal to 180.

x + (4x + 5) = 180

5x + 5 = 180

5x = 175

x = 35

Now that we have the value of the smaller angle, we can plug in to get the larger angle.

y = 4x + 5

y = 4(35) + 5

y = 140 + 5

y = 145

3 0

2 years ago

A resident of Bayport claims to the City Council that the proportion of Westside residents

Kazeer [188]

Answer:

The test statistics is $z = -1.56$

The p-value is $p-value = 0.05938$

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told

The West side sample size is $n_1 = 578$

The number of residents on the West side with income below poverty level is $k = 76$

The East side sample size $n_2=688$

The number of residents on the East side with income below poverty level is $u = 112$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p_1 = p_2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 < p_2$

Generally the sample proportion of West side is

$\^{p} _1 = \frac{k}{n_1}$

=> $\^{p} _1 = \frac{76}{578}$

=> $\^{p} _1 = 0.1315$

Generally the sample proportion of West side is

$\^{p} _2 = \frac{u}{n_2}$

=> $\^{p} _2 = \frac{112}{688}$

=> $\^{p} _2 = 0.1628$

Generally the pooled sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$p = \frac{k + u}{ n_1 + n_2 }$

=> $p = \frac{76 + 112}{ 578 + 688 }$

=> $p =0.1485$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

$z = \frac{\^ {p}_1 - \^{p}_2}{\sqrt{p(1- p) [\frac{1}{n_1 } + \frac{1}{n_2} ]} }$

=> $z = \frac{ 0.1315 - 0.1628 }{\sqrt{0.1485(1-0.1485) [\frac{1}{578} + \frac{1}{688} ]} }$

=> $z = -1.56$

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = P(z < -1.56 )$

From z-table

$P(z < -1.56 ) = 0.05938$

So

$p-value = 0.05938$

3 0

3 years ago