Answer:
Explanation:
In the 1830s, American abolitionists, led by Evangelical Protestants, gained momentum in their battle to end slavery. Abolitionists believed that slavery was a national sin, and that it was the moral obligation of every American to help eradicate it from the American landscape by gradually freeing the slaves and returning them to Africa.. Not all Americans agreed. Views on slavery varied state by state, and among family members and neighbors. Many Americans—Northerners and Southerners alike—did not support abolitionist goals, believing that anti-slavery activism created economic instability and threatened the racial social order.
But by the mid-nineteenth century, the ideological contradictions between a national defense of slavery on American soil on the one hand, and the universal freedoms espoused in the Declaration of Independence on the other hand, had created a deep moral schism in the national culture. During the thirty years leading up to the Civil War, anti-slavery organizations proliferated, and became increasingly effective in their methods of resistance. As the century progressed, branches of the abolitionist movement became more radical, calling for the immediate end of slavery. Public opinion varied widely, and different branches of the movement disagreed on how to achieve their aims. But abolitionists found enough strength in their commonalities—a belief in individual liberty and a strong Protestant evangelical faith—to move their agenda forward
Maybe tradition?
What are the choices given?
Answer:
Market equilibrium occurs when market supply equals market demand. The equilibrium price of a good or service, therefore, is its price when the supply of it equals the demand for it. :)
Explanation:
Answer:
See Explanation
Explanation:
Mother, father, please read this letter and take my words into consideration because I mean them with all my heart. I do not want to marry the person you want me to marry. I know they're in the same caste as I, but I do not love them. I'm human; I have emotions, wants, needs, feelings -- if I marry this person, trust I will be miserable. Imagine being forced into a situation you don't want to be in, and you'll be in that situation for the rest of your life. You can never fufill your wants and needs because of the situation. You're stuck. It would be horrible, wouldn't it? So why would you make me walk down that path and live that life? I want to be happy, we all do, and I won't be happy if I can't make decisions for myself and marry someone I truly love. You'd be ruining my life by making me marry someone from the same caste. When it comes to love, social status, looks, and wealth don't matter. What matters is on the inside. A caste doesn't define someone. Therefore, I should be able to marry who I want to, no matter the caste.
This is only 203 words, I'm not learning the same material as you so I'm sure you could add more to it.
