All categories

3 years ago

What is the order of these fractions from least to greatest 2/3 7/10 5/8 65/100

Mathematics

1 answer:

baherus [9]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

hello : 5/8; 65/100 ; 2/3 ; 7/10

Step-by-step explanation:

lcm: (least common divisor) for : 3 ; 10 ; 8 ; 100 is 600

2/3 = (2×200)/(3×200) = 400 /600

7/10 = (7×60)/(10×60) = 420 /600

5/8 = (5×75)/(8×75) = 375 /600

65/100 = (65×6)/(100×6) = 390 /600

the order of these fractions from least to greatest is:

5/8 ; 65/100 ; 2/3 ; 7/10

You might be interested in

9) A heptagon has 6 exterior angles with measures of 47, 55, 62, 64, 54, and 49. What is the measure of the interior angle adjac

svetlana [45]

Answer:

seventh interior angle=∠x=29°

Step-by-step explanation:

sum of interior angle of polygon is equal to 360°

let seventh angle of heptagon is x

∠x+47°+55°+62°+64°+54°+49°=360°

∠x=360°-(47°+55°+62°+64°+54°+49°)

∠x=360°-331°=29°

∠x=29°

seventh interior angle=∠x=29° answer

6 0

2 years ago

Round 637.892 to whole number

Stels [109]

Answer:

638

Step-by-step explanation:

its 638, not 639 because its above 638.5

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Fill in the blanks below.

Crank

The slope for the first one would be:
y2-y1/x2-x1, so replace those with the coordinates and you'll get:
-3-1/-7-(-7) => -4/0 so I guess the slope is zero

the slope for the second one would be:
-3-(-3)/5-(-4)=> 0/9 I think this one would be undefined.
Check to make sure, though!

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The USA won 15 Wimbledon championships. Sweden and Switzerland both won 7. Australia won 6, German won 4, and Spain won 2. Write

mihalych1998 [28]

Well you add the total of championships. 15+7+7+6+4+2=41
The ratio is 6:41
This means that Australia won 6 of the 41 championships.

5 0

3 years ago

The distribution of individual incomes in the United States is strongly skewed to the right. In 2013, the mean and median income

vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

The mean would be $322,343 and the median would be $196,723.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the distribution of individual incomes is skewed to the right, it means that the distribution has a long right tail.

Drawing a distribution with this characteristic, we can see how the majority of the data falls into the left side of the graphic, meaning that a lot of people receive less income. Following this reasoning, the mean which is the amount of the data (in this case individual income) divided by the amount of people, would be the higher number, meaning that the few people who earn more money would influence in making this number higher.

Following this reasoning, the median (which is not influenced by this difference) would be the less high number.

5 0

3 years ago