The rebels were fighting for their independence because the United
States did not give it to them. The Philippine's were in a constant
struggle to gain independence after the Spanish stopped ruling the
country. This led to the Philippine-American War, and even after both
wars officially ended, some rebel groups continued to fight American
soldiers. Many civilians died from starvation and disease in comparison
to warfare deaths and English became the national language, instead of
Spanish.
Answer:
He named "absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority the vital principle of republics, from which there is no appeal but to force." The principle demanded freedom of opinion and debate, including the right of any minority to turn itself into a new majority.
You can't force people into doing what you want and that turning a minority into a new minority because it is not that easy to became a new minority in just one day
Answer:
Howard Zinn's history is often at odds with how Republicans and Federalists portray history. While Republicans tend to portray Abraham Lincoln as the person who ended slavery, Zinn sees Lincoln as a figure who transitions Black people into a different kind of slavery. While Federalists claimed a big central government would be the best way to look out for the interests of all people, Zinn claims the Federalists's main priority was to advance the interests of the wealthy.
Zinn's view was that traditional American histories were sympathetic to the nation's social and economic elites. The aim of the revolution, Zinn argues, was to divert colonial class anger of the 1760s, shifting it away from colonial assemblies and onto the British government.
Zinn believes that the Constitution does not provide adequate protection for certain segments of the American population. He says in regards to this concept: The slightly prosperous people who make up this base of support are buffers against the blacks, the Indians, the very poor whites.
Explanation:
