Answer:
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Justice Jackson's characterization of Marshall's Gibbons opinion was correct when he described the Ogden v. Gibbons case, “Chief Justice Marshall described the federal commerce power with a breadth never exceeded”(Justice Jackson). ... Gibbons he ruled when the federal government has power according to the commerce clause.
Explanation:
<h2>Hope this helps :)</h2>
Answer:
the answer would be the 'Executive Branch'
Explanation:
Unlike members of Congress, the president and vice president are not elected directly by the people every four years.
Answer:
current societal norms rendered the charitable immunity doctrine inapplicable to this case and that fundamental fairness allowed the court to deviate from established case precedent and find for Flagiello.
Explanation:
In Appeals, Nos. 293 and 351, Jan. T., 1964, from judgments of Court of Common Pleas No. 4 of Philadelphia County, Dec. T., 1963, No. 4018 is found a case of Mrs. C Mary, and her husband Thomas Flagiello against the Pennsylvania Hospital, in which the Flagiellos rightly stated that Mrs Mary was injured in the Pennsylvania Hospital where she paid $24.50 a day for hospital facilities and nursing care. An action of trespass was brought against the medical institution and two employees were said to be involved.
The hospital accepted their wrong doings but they should not be liable since they are an organization dependent on charity. After series of legal proceedings, the court finally affirmed that precedents would not be followed in the case and that charities, like the hospital, must be liable
