1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sav [38]
2 years ago
6

Several u. S. Southern states pass a law that restricts the sale of alcohol by businesses on sunday between the hours of 6am and

midnight. A few weeks later, the federal government passes a law that says no jurisdiction shall restrict the sale of alcohol in any manner. Would the states still be permitted to restrict sales of alcohol within their borders?.
Law
1 answer:
Jobisdone [24]2 years ago
8 0

The selling of alcohol by businesses on Sundays between the hours of 6 a.m. and midnight is prohibited by legislation passed in some Southern states of the United States. A few weeks later, the federal government enacts legislation that prohibits all local governments from placing any restrictions on the sale of alcohol. Would the states still be able to impose restrictions on the sale of alcohol inside their borders?

No, because federal law preempts state law.

Because of the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, when state and federal laws conflict, federal law takes precedence over or preempts state law.

The Supremacy Clause functions to make federal law preempt state law when the federal government and a state government both pass legislation in the same field. The third provision stipulates that all federal employees, regardless of their branch of service, must swear an oath to uphold the Constitution.

To know more visit : brainly.com/question/13839329

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Read the example in the reference image. This is an example of the government doing what?
stepan [7]

Answer:

B: keeping foo safe

Explanation:

I guess i don't <em>need</em> an explanation, right?

5 0
3 years ago
The Fourteenth Amendment establishes that no state can be allowed to remove any rights of citizens, that all persons who are bor
Schach [20]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and it addresses the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.

An equal protection is a clause that states and guarantees that no state and local governments shall make or enforce any law which would contravene the privileges, rights or immunities of all persons born or naturalized in the United States of America.

Simply stated, the equal protection guarantees that all citizens will be treated equally by the law. Also, the equal protection clause took effect in the United States of America in 1868.

7 0
3 years ago
1. Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the t
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a courtroom demeanor.

Explanation:

Courtroom demeanor refers to one's professionalism within a court of law. Your courtroom demeanor is an extremely crucial factor to how exactly your witness testimony is perceived by the jury or bench.

5 0
3 years ago
George owns 300 shares of preferred stock in a company. By owning preferred stock, George has:
Temka [501]

Answer:

Trey owns 250 shares of common stock in a toy-store company. This means that he owns a percentage of the company based on the proportion of shares he owns out of the total shares issued by the company. With this ownership he also acquires rights to: vote. George owns 300 shares of preferred stock in a company.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How personal injury lawyer play a role leading safely initiative by helping those injured
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

By disseminating, on an anonymous basis, actual legal cases detailing errors that caused avoidable patient injury, healthcare providers and their risk managers will engage in discussions that logically will lead to reduced incidences of similar injuries.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Barbie committed a felony and has to appear in court.
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a consequence of careless driving?
    11·2 answers
  • No defined policy on refugees existed in Canada until the late
    10·2 answers
  • A judge cites precedent when delivering a ruling in a case. In doing this, he is harkening back to a practice begun in which set
    15·1 answer
  • Groups such as the Plug Uglies, the Swamp Angels, the Daybreak Boys, and the Bowery Boys are associated with
    8·1 answer
  • Why do you think it is so important that financial records are maintained well? What would be a potential negative consequence b
    8·1 answer
  • Why do we say the canadian constitution is made up of many parts???
    12·1 answer
  • You’re called to a large fight in progress numerous people injured and hurt. EMS is en route. There are 3-4 witnesses and 2 comb
    7·2 answers
  • Who is responsible for arguing for someone’s innocence in a court of law?
    8·1 answer
  • There is no evidence that giving_____to your children makes them hyperactive.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!