Answer:
The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.
The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.
It states, for instance, that
<em>"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
</em>
- <em>
protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety
</em>
- <em>prevent disorder or crime
</em>
- <em>protect health or morals
</em>
- <em>protect the rights and reputations of other people
</em>
- <em>prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence
</em>
- <em>maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"</em>
Cheers!
Answer:
puch your teacher in da face
Explanation:
u make her stipid tell her that yu is smarti
Answer:
Bounty collectors hunt them down
Explanation:
If someone tries to escape from a on going trial, the court has a "police force" they're not exactly police. but they are called "Bounty Hunters" And they capture escaped people.
Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.
<h3>
What is economic espionage?</h3>
- Economic espionage includes electronic hacking and illegal trespassing to obtain a competitor's proprietary information.
- Economic espionage is defined as the illegal or covert targeting or acquisition of sensitive financial, trade, or economic policy information; proprietary economic information; or technological information.
- Using bribery, cyber-attacks, "dumpster diving," and wiretapping.
- Creating seemingly innocent relationships with US companies in order to gather economic intelligence, including trade secrets.
- President Clinton signed the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 into law.
- It criminalizes the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets.
- It is notable for being the first federal statute to broadly define and severely punish such misappropriation and theft.
Therefore, electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.
Know more about economic espionage here:
brainly.com/question/28218496
#SPJ4
