1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mrs_skeptik [129]
3 years ago
13

Construct the debate format by matching each statement to the correct part in the debate

English
1 answer:
erik [133]3 years ago
7 0

Explanation:

Topic> Should reuse and recycling be required?

Proposition> Yes, because it saves the environment

Counterargument proposition> No, because it can be a burden to people who must have sterile materials and can't reuse original materials

Rebuttal opposition> Used equipment can be recycled in some cases New items should be allowed for medical reasons

Opposition> A person's health is more important than the environment. However, nonmedical items could have a reuse or recycle requirement

Counterargument opposition> Even though natural resources should be preserved, our prionty should be people

Rebuttal opposition>

Even though people are important and should be treated respectfully, the environment shouldn't pay the price

You might be interested in
(DOING A BUNCH OF THESE so if you can't answer the first time, you will have another chance to)
Dvinal [7]

Answer:

Happy holidays to you as well! Please stay in good health, we need more people like you in the world! Have a nice night friend.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pedro hit the golf ball the _______ of his teammates on the first hole.
Mila [183]

Answer:

C. Powerfulliest

Explanation:

Since the sentence says that Pedro hit the golf ball harder than any of his teammates, that means he hit it the powerfulliest out of every person in his team. If he hit it harder than on of his teammates, it would be powerfullier. But the answer for this is C.

6 0
3 years ago
Just have damaged is an helping verb
kumpel [21]

Explanation:

i don't understand what you mean?

3 0
3 years ago
(52 points)
igomit [66]

Answer:

Graffiti should be considered a crime. If someone calls vandalizing other peoples property art, then that person is wrong. Graffiti is wrong because it is done on properties that the artist do not own , most of the time graffiti is disrespectful, and it is very costly to the community.

       Graffiti is wrong because it is done on properties that the artist do not own. If someone was to vandalize another persons home with graffiti written on it, that person would feel very disrespected. Although sometimes graffiti is beautiful, we would not want a person to vandalize our property and have them call it art. It would be fine if a graffiti artist were to draw on their own property because it belongs to them. It is very disrespectful for someone to draw on someone else's property without permission. Which brings me to my second point.

         Most of the time graffiti is disrespectful. The artist have no concern on what they draw that might offend other people who have the chance to see it.  Graffiti artist are truly gifted, so this means they can make their art look very realistic. Someone might say, if someone does not want to see it then they should not look. Whoever might say that is very wrong. Graffiti artist tend to draw art on almost anything that they can. This means they draw it for the public to see, whether the public wishes to see it or not. Some graffiti artist do not care what they write, but parents do. A parents does not want to walk with their child somewhere crowded, and see something inappropriate drawn or written for their child to see. Which brings me to my third and final point.

         Graffiti is very costly to the community to get it removed. That is why graffiti artist should not draw offensive things, but they do anyway and the community has to pay to get it removed. This is just like the app Instagram. If someone were to post something offensive towards the public, someone would report it, so it could get removed because what they saw were either offensive to them, their children, or they were thinking about everyone else that might come across that post. This relates to graffiti. If the community were to leave something that were offensive to the community there would be problems, not small problems, but big enough problems that could get people hurt.

         Although graffiti is a wonderful thing to see, it should be called a crime because it can corrupt young minds and cause problems.

   

Explanation:

Sorry if this is not what you were looking for!

7 0
2 years ago
Which is the best example of how to use a hyphen? amus-ing all-star sis-ter in-vite
murzikaleks [220]
All-star is the best example it shouldnt interrupt a word
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Compare and contrast
    15·1 answer
  • Coronavirus is our Future. Check off the boxes that apply to this video. *
    5·2 answers
  • Which sentence makes a claim for an argument about why students should be required to wear uniforms in school?
    5·2 answers
  • Which two words share a prefix
    6·1 answer
  • What type of figurative language is in the poem A Lady by Amy Lowell?
    14·1 answer
  • Can you tell me what Is Pleonasm?
    12·1 answer
  • Can you help me answer this question? .. <br> #thanks..please
    5·2 answers
  • Imagery is defined as_____.
    12·2 answers
  • What is the point of view of the authour in document 4?<br>​
    13·1 answer
  • Which sentence is most precise? O She returned the computer to the store after she realized it was broken. O She returned the co
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!