Whereas Locke spoke of life, liberty and estate, the Declaration of Independence speaks in terms of life, liberty, and the <u>pursuit of happiness</u><u>.</u>
In John Locke's way of framing his theory, "life, liberty, and estates" all constitute an individual's personal property. We normally think of "property" just in terms of one's "estate" -- that is land, house, belongings. From Locke's perspective, however, our property is <u>everything</u> that belongs to us as persons, which begins with our personhood itself. Having life and personal liberty -- those are the most important things we possess. Then comes "estate" or our land, house, belongings.
Thomas Jefferson's words in the Declaration of Independence have a similar theme, though worded differently. Pursuing happiness--a meaningful and fulfilling life--cannot happen unless life and liberty are respected and protected first.
Answer:
Hatshepsut:
Renewal and expansion of the Empire’s road network.
Commercial Trade Expedition to the Land of Punt.
Building of several Temples, Tombs, Obelisks (Temple of Pakhet, Mortuary Temple of Hapshesout).
Thutmose III
Military Conquest and punitive campaigns (First Campaign against King of Kadesh, Conquest of Syria, Subjugation of Canaan, Nubian Campaign)
Construction Projects (50 temples, further development of Karnak, Mortuary Complex).
Explanation:
hope this is what you needed! :)
Answer:Representative democracy, also known as indirect democracy or representative government, is a type of democracy founded on the principle of elected officials representing a group of people, as opposed to direct democracy.
Explanation:brainliest plz
Briggs v. Elliott. It was the first of the five cases combined into Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the famous case in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional, violating the Fourteenth Amendment 's Equal Protection Clause. Following the Brown decision,...
Answer:
a) the advantages a candidate who is running for re-election has over the candidate trying to unseat him or her
Explanation:
Incumbency effect can be defined as the advantages a candidate who is running for re-election has over the candidate trying to unseat him or her in a democratic election process.
Basically, it refers to the tendency (phenomenon) for public officials such as senators or house of representative members who are already holding power (office) to get re-elected over an opposition. This ultimately implies that, a candidate contesting with an incumbent candidate is automatically placed at a disadvantage to emerge as the winner election due to the power of incumbency (incumbency effect).
<em>Additionally, the incumbency effect is peculiar to democratic elections and most favorable or stronger for the house of representative members.</em>
