The contradiction can be explained by the substitutability between Jimmy Choo shoes and other shoes.
Substitutability is the ability of goods or services to be replaced by another good or services to be replaced by another good or service in use or consumption. Substitute goods are goods which, as a result of changed conditions, may replace each other in use. For example in this case, jimmy choo faces other competitors who have substitute shoes.
Answer:
$88,000
Explanation:
The computation of the ending balance of the retained earning balance is shown below:
As we know that
The ending balance of retained earning = Beginning balance of retained earnings + net income - dividend paid
where,
net income is
= Revenues - expenses
= $50,500 - $33,000
= $17,500
And, the other items values would remain the same
So, the ending balance is
= $92,500 + $17,500 - $22,000
= $88,000
Answer: impression management
Explanation:
This is a strategy where one wants to maintain how people sees them by saying particular things that will make them look impressive or do certain things that will make them look impressive either because they want to be liked or they want to maintain a certain status amongst their friends.
Tracy wants to maintain her status hence she has to lie to her friends to keep looking like a great person who is achieving great things in life even when she is not.
She has to maintain that impression they have of her that she has probably built over time amongst her friends .
Answer:
$258077.04
Explanation:
The cost of the house is $350,000
Apply compound interest formula
A=P(1+r/n)^nt
where
A=amount of loan after the period has elapse=?
P=principal deposit amount=$50,000
r=rate of interest in decimal form=0.07%
t=time taken for the loan to mature
n=1
A=$50,000(1+0.07)^9
A=$50,000*(1.07)^9
A=$91922.96
Remaining balance =$350000-$91922.96=$258077.04
Answer:
The ratio of net income distribution
= $20,000: $30,000
= 2:3
Explanation:
The ratio of income distribution is the ratio of capital contributed by each partner. A contributes $20,000 while B contributes $30,000. The ratio of net income distribution is 2:3.
