Savannah Guthrie is apparently not leaving the today show. as she is working from home due to the need to isolate.
<h3>
Savannah Guthrie on leaving the show</h3>
Savannah Guthrie is an Australian-born American broadcast journalist and attorney.
Savannah Guthrie is a main co-anchor of the today show
Reports shows that she is apparently not leaving the today show but she is working from home as she told her com anchor Hoda Kotb
More on News
brainly.com/question/8190186
Answer:
There was no central leadership, congress had no power to enforce its laws, and there was no national court system.
Demographics come into play in not only politics but in lots of situations. Companies use demographics in order to see who buys their product. So, yes, in Politics demographics may be a wise choice because certain kinds of people may be more likely to vote for a said candidate than others.
The stage of development which occurred immediately before the aforementioned stage of deciding expected team behaviors, apportioning the work, and developing team spirit is: Norming stage.
A team can be defined as set of individuals or a group of people that are having various skill set, knowledge, ideas and experience, coming together to work on a project or task, in order to successfully achieve a set goal and objective.
According to Bruce Tuckman, the five (5) distinct stages that most teams follow to become high performing include:
After weathering or overcoming the storms, the next stage of the team development process is norming.
At the norming stage, a sense of cohesion and unity emerges among the team members because they begin to cooperate among themselves and are focused on achieving their collective goals and objectives.
Hence, the team can then proceed to the next stage (performing), wherein expected team behaviors are decided, work is apportioned, and team spirit are developed.
Read more: brainly.com/question/21140502
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
