1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hatshy [7]
3 years ago
13

What does Emperor Hirohito’s statement during his surrender speech reveal about the impact of nuclear weapons?

History
1 answer:
NeTakaya3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It revealed that nuclear weapons were immensely powerful and the most willful warriors were still vulnerable to it.

Explanation:

The introduction of nuclear weapons meant warfare would never be conducted the same way again since, a nation with such weapons could use them to destroy any army no matter how well trained or armed. They would be used anywhere that was considered a high threat and even on civilians if need be.

You might be interested in
About how many people live in Lima?
AfilCa [17]
Less than 2.5 mill I think
3 0
3 years ago
62 POINTS Why are some citizens and leaders reluctant to take in refugees from predominantly Muslim countries? IN writing.
4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

racism

Explanation:

there racist islamaphobes :)

hope this helped

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 5 (1 point)
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

He was a soviet states man

8 0
3 years ago
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable? Why or why not?
Tcecarenko [31]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?

No, really not.

The reason why because his account had created many controversies.

Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.

So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.

8 0
3 years ago
The name Anasazi means what?
nexus9112 [7]
A. Ancient Ones
I just looked it up on google
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why are eyewitness accounts important to historical research? because human error can make historical research unreliable becaus
    16·2 answers
  • 20 POINTS TO WHOEVER ANSWERS FIRST
    5·2 answers
  • 8. In most cases, a majority of House members must be present for a bill to be
    5·1 answer
  • Provide 3 examples of Roosevelt enacting "Big Stick" policies.
    6·1 answer
  • How many years are represented on the timeline?
    13·2 answers
  • Why do some people consider the way the media cover candidates for public office bad for democracy?
    7·1 answer
  • Choose the best answer.
    12·1 answer
  • What were the opposing viewpoints that Texans debated regarding the future of their nation? Check all of the boxes that apply. a
    11·2 answers
  • who collected over 5,000 Latin and Greek sayings, put together the first complete Greek manuscript of the New Testament in Weste
    9·1 answer
  • What challenges did the Spaniards face as they traveled to New Spain?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!