The following statements explains what happened during the Haymarket Square incident,
- "Public fear of anarchists and foreigners led to false accusations"
- "Rally leaders were illegally arrested and convicted"
- "A peaceful labor rally ended with a bomb exploding"
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Haymarket Affair (otherwise called the Haymarket Massacre, Haymarket Riot, or Haymarket Square Riot) was the fallout of a bombing that occurred at a work exhibition on May 4, 1886, at Haymarket Square in Chicago.
The rally started on 4th May and Albert Parsons, August Spies, and Samuel Fielden addressed the crowd who gathered for a peaceful negotiation of the worker's rights estimated from 600 to 3,000 in a open wagon near square on Des Plaines Street.
After the rally started, police arrived in group at around 10.30 pm and ordered the crowd rallying to disperse. Home-made bomb filled with dynamite was thrown in the path of the police coming towards them. At once after the bombing, gunshots were exchanged.
Arrest and conviction:
- 8 agitators were accused of plotting and doing the shelling (despite the fact that proof against them was powerless)
- 4 were hung, 1 self-murdered in jail, 3 were detained until John Peter Altgeld drove their sentences in 1893
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The impact World War I had on the women who were left home and the men who were in the trenches was devastating in different ways.
First, if men were drafted, they had to leave home to enlist in the military. That was the first shock. Most of them knew they were going to die on the battlefield.
That impacted the family in that women, mothers, had to be in charge of the house, raise children, get a job to feed the family members, knowing that they could never see again their husbands. That should have been a traumatic experience.
Children! How a mother could explain to children that their dad was not going to get back home. Too much pain and suffereing.
The opportunity cost in this scenario is the three lost opportunities Harry experiences by deciding to go to his parents house. The term opportunity cost refers to <em>the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen. </em>The potential gain Harry may have lost by choosing to go to his parents for dinner instead could be <em>relaxation while fishing, His house painting being finished, and time spent with his friends at the birthday party. </em>These all can be considers lost opportunity due to choosing an alternate opportunity, that being dinner at his parents.
Answer:
The great wall of china? which wall are you talking about
Explanation:
Qin Dynasty I think
Answer:
We are in the 21st century.
It runs from 2000-2100.
