The new life for immigrants in America was harsh. Most immigrants were poor and in order to support their family's they had to find a job and a living space quickly. Since they needed to make money quickly factories would often offer them a job but pay them less than they would Americans. The immigrants took up the job offers since it was the only thing that would help them support their families.
I hope this helps!
<h3>
PLEASE DO NOT COPY WORD FOR WORD. USE THIS AS AN INSPIRATION TO SPARK YOUR OWN IDEAS!</h3><h3>THANK YOU!</h3>
The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
It's true that Decisions made by the US court
I’m lost can u help find the Mac and cheese hope this makes you smile HEY whoa
