Answer: According to the principle of comparative advantage, worldwide output and consumption will be higher when nations specialize in the production of those goods and services "a. they can provide at a lower opportunity costs."
Explanation: The comparative advantage is the ability of a country to produce a good using relatively less resources than another. The theory of comparative advantages says that Each country in question will specialize in what is most efficient. At the same time, it will import the rest of the products in which they are most ineffective in terms of production. Although a country does not have an absolute advantage in producing any good, it may specialize in those goods in which it finds a greater comparative advantage and finally be able to participate in the international market.
When someone like Kelsie blames Steve for all her shortcomings at work even though he is the hardest working member on the team, it is an example of political workplace deviance. Therefore, the option B holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of workplace deviance?</h3>
Workplace deviance can be referred to or considered as the tendency of an employee or a member of an organization to intentionally cause a sense of harm to the regular functioning of the organization.
A political deviance is a type of workplace deviance wherein an employee in higher authority starts blaming others for slightest of irregularities in the team.
Therefore, the option B holds true and states regarding the significance of workplace deviance.
Learn more about workplace deviance here:
brainly.com/question/28538100
#SPJ1
The missing options to the question are added below for better reference.
A. group deviance
B. political deviance
C. personal aggression deviance
D. property deviance
Ur at a 50:50 chance of getting right. Just guess :p
Answer:
Expected Net Cash Flow = $3.8 million
Net Present Value (NPV) = $1.0492 million
Explanation:
Given Cash outflow = $10 million
Provided cash inflows as follows:
Particulars Good condition Moderate condition Bad Condition
Probability 30% 40% 30%
Cash flow $9 million $4 million $1 million
Average expected cash flow each year = ($9 million X 30 %) + ($4 million X 40%) + ($1 million X 30%) = $2.7 million + $1.6 million + $0.3 million = $4.6 million
Three year expected cash flow = ($4.6 million each year X 3) - $10 million = $13.8 million - $10 million = $3.8 million
While calculating NPV we will use Present Value Annuity Factor (PVAF) @12% for 3 years = ![\frac{1}{(1 + 0.12){^1}} + \frac{1}{(1 + 0.12){^2}} + \frac{1}{(1 + 0.12){^3}} = 2.402](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%281%20%2B%200.12%29%7B%5E1%7D%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%281%20%2B%200.12%29%7B%5E2%7D%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%281%20%2B%200.12%29%7B%5E3%7D%7D%20%3D%202.402)
NPV = PV of inflows - PV of Outflows = $4.6 million X 2.402 - $10 million = $11.0492 million - $10 million = $1.0492 million
Expected Net Cash Flow = $3.8 million
Net Present Value (NPV) = $1.0492 million