Answer:
B. Linear Model
Explanation:
A. Interactive Model - is not the correct answer. The interactive model of communication is taking into consideration the exchange of thought between the sender and receiver, where communication goes both ways. This model focuses mostly on the process of communication itself.
<u>B. Linear model – is the right answer. </u>The linear model of communication is the “one-way” communication, meaning it is only the sender who transmits the message, while the receiver doesn’t send back the feedback or reply. <u>The message is the key to this model, and therefore this kind of communication focuses on the message that is sent to the recipient. </u>
C. Transactional model – is the wrong answer. The transactional model focuses on the communication that goes back and forth between the sender and the receiver, and messages can go simultaneously from both ways. This is n why the focus in this model is how the message was transmitted (as the name suggests) and how it was received).
D. A combination of A and B – this is not the right answer, as we have already proved that A is not a suitable answer to this question.
Answer:Horse
Explanation:
Because I am powerful, personable, and upbeat. My zest for life is contagious, and my friends and family admire it– even if it can be a little stubborn at times.
C that would be the most realistic answer
Answer:
I believe the option that is a conceit in the selection to be:
D) the poet's willingness to accept the same fate as a flower
Explanation:
A conceit is a type of figure of speech. It is similar to an extended metaphor, but it uses unconventional comparisons. In other words, it goes beyond by providing an intellectual and complex comparison between two things that are dissimilar. Conceit seems to be quite common in metaphysical poetry, since metaphysical poets tend to develop their subjects and topics in a more intellectualized or sophisticated manner.
<u>Having that in mind, we can see how comparing one's life to that of a flower is quite metaphorical. But Herbert goes beyond. Not only does he compare his life to that of a flower, but he even accepts the same fate. The flower does not live long, but it does serve a purpose both when it is alive and when it is dead (ornament and cures, respectively). The speaker wishes the same for himself - he wants his life to be as purposeful as the flowers, even if he does not live for a long time. That seems to be quite a metaphysical interpretation of the comparison and, therefore, a conceit.</u>
