Answer:
Any [a,b] that does NOT include the x-value 3 in it.
Either an [a,b] entirely to the left of 3, or
an [a,b] entirely to the right of 3
Step-by-step explanation:
The intermediate value theorem requires for the function for which the intermediate value is calculated, to be continuous in a closed interval [a,b]. Therefore, for the graph of the function shown in your problem, the intermediate value theorem will apply as long as the interval [a,b] does NOT contain "3", which is the x-value where the function shows a discontinuity.
Then any [a,b] entirely to the left of 3 (that is any [a,b] where b < 3; or on the other hand any [a,b] completely to the right of 3 (that is any [a,b} where a > 3, will be fine for the intermediate value theorem to apply.
Answer:
<em>Hello your question is incomplete attached below is the complete question</em>
answer : There is not convincing statistical evidence to suggest that the proportion of customers who order dessert at each restaurant is not the same based on family classification. ( E )
Step-by-step explanation:
To arrive at this conclusion we will determine the Null and alternate hypothesis
<em>H0 : Number that orders dessert is same based on family classification given</em>
<em>Ha : Number that orders dessert is not the same based on family classification given </em>
from the question the p-value of Chi-square test is 0.092 > 0.05 hence we will fail to reject the null hypothesis. therefore we can conclude that
There is not convincing statistical evidence to suggest that the proportion of customers who order dessert at each restaurant is not the same based on family classification
Ok i will give you a hint ok look subtract 18-30 then you will get yhe answef for 8× ok try it
Step-by-step explanation:
x + y = 9. => 2x + 2y = 18.
2x + 2y = 18
- (2x - 3y = -12)
=> 5y = 30, y = 6.
Therefore x + (6) = 9, x = 3.
The solution is x = 3 and y = 6.