1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marissa [1.9K]
4 years ago
14

A 4.5 percent corporate coupon bond is callable in five years for a call premium of one year of coupon payments. Assuming a par

value of $1,000, what is the price paid to the bondholder if the issuer calls the bond?
Business
1 answer:
Oduvanchick [21]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Price paid to the bondholder $1045

Explanation:

given data:

Par value = $1000

percentage of corporate coupon = 4.5%

call premium is for one year coupon payments

call premium = 1 year coupon

call premium  = 1000 x 4.5% = 45

Price paid to the bondholder = Par value + call premium  

putting all value to get the total price to be paid to bondholder

Price paid to the bondholder = 1000 + 45 = $1045

You might be interested in
The Spokes Bikes makes 18 bicycle models in more than 2 million combinations, with each combination designed to fit the needs of
creativ13 [48]
C.) mass customization
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the article by Hutchinson, Farris and Anders (2007), cash-to-cash analysis is difficult because financial data and
Margarita [4]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

"Cash-to-cash Analysis and Management" by<em> Hutchinson, Farris and Anders</em> talks about the availability of the<em> financial data</em> and <em>computer technology</em> in assisting a business when it comes to determining its <u>cash-to-cash position </u><em><u>(C2C)</u></em><em>,</em> as well as the <em>benchmarks</em> needed for comparison.

Cash-to-cash analysis was difficult in the past, however, it is easier nowadays. The supply chain is even examined at a broader view than before. C2C efficiency is possible by utilizing the<em> readily available</em> financial date and computer technology. So, this makes the statement above as "false."

So, this explains the answer.

6 0
3 years ago
Two investors have the following pattern of expected returns (Before-Tax Cash Flows): Investment A: Y1: $5,000; Y2: $10,000; Y3:
Arada [10]

Answer:

Investment A = 11.089%

Investment B = 12.772%

Explanation:

The internal rate of return is the discount rate that equates the after tax cash flows from an investment to the amount invested.

The internal rate of return can be calculated using a financial calculator

For investment A,

Cash flow in year zero = -$110,000

Cash flow in year 1 = $5,000

cash flow in Y2 = $10,000

cash flow in Y3 = $12,000

Cash flow in Y4 = $15,000 + $120,000 = $135,000

Irr = 11.089%

For investment B,

Cash flow in year zero = -$120,000

Cash flow in year one = $2,000

cash flow inY2: $4,000

cash flow in Y3: $1,000

cash flow in Y4: $5,000 + $180,000 = $185,000

IRR = 12.772%

To find the IRR using a financial calacutor:

1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

2. After inputting all the cash flows, press the IRR button and then press the compute button.

I hope my answer helps you

4 0
3 years ago
"Diminishing marginal​ returns" refer to a situation in which the ______.A. average product of the last worker hired is less tha
galben [10]

Answer: C. marginal product of the last worker hired is less than the marginal product of the previous worker hired

This statement is correct because marginal product refers to the increase in the production, when 1 worker is added to the production process. Diminishing marginal returns set in when adding one extra worker increases the production less than the previous worker did.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Use the following two links to answer the following questions: Nominal Wages (W) Price index CPI (P) a) (5 points) Calculate the
g100num [7]

Answer:

3.45%

Explanation:

the real wage at the beginning of the recession (12/07) = nominal wage / price index Dec. 2007 = $17.70 / 2.1141 = $8.3721

the real wage at the end of the recession (6/09) = nominal wage / price index June 2009 = $18.53 / 2.14527= $8.6609

% change in real wage = [($8.6609 - $8.3721) / $8.3721] x 100 = 3.44955% = 3.45%

Due to the recession, the price index changed less than the nominal wages since the inflation rate was very low. It is normal that during recessions, specially severe ones, the inflation rate decreases or even turns negative (what happened in Europe in those years).

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Larry Gaines, a single taxpayer, age 42, sells his personal residence on November 12, 2019, for $151,200. He lived in the house
    9·1 answer
  • ) the price of gasoline is $2.50 per gallon at the closest gas station, but is only $2.30 per gallon at a gas station two miles
    7·1 answer
  • When a customer pays far enough in advance to require the seller to record interest expense and accrued interest payable based o
    11·1 answer
  • Sarasota Company has a factory machine with a book value of $86,300 and a remaining useful life of 7 years. It can be sold for $
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how can you avoid conflict by adjusting your own behavior?
    13·2 answers
  • When the Mexican government changes the fixed exchange rate of the peso relative to the U.S. dollar from 1.5 (pesos/U.S. dollar)
    10·1 answer
  • Lesson 7-1 single payment loans
    5·1 answer
  • An investor believes that the U.S. dollar will rise in value relative to the Japanese yen. The same investor is considering two
    5·1 answer
  • What stock should I buy
    9·1 answer
  • A $15 cash payment is made to Starbucks to purchase coffee for a business client, a $64 cash payment is made for supplies purcha
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!