division problem
In a division problem, the number being divided into pieces is the dividend. The number by which the dividend is divided is called the divisor. And the answer to the division problem is the quotient.
Answer:
After 23 years , the capital will get three times as big
Step-by-step explanation:
Firstly, let us write the compound interest formula
P = I( 1 + r)^n
Since we are considering a capital rise of 3 times
If I, the initial value is x, the P
value later will be 3x
Interest rate is 5/100 = 0.05
so we need the value of t
This will be;
3x = x(1 + 0.05)^t
3= 1.05^t
ln 3 = t ln 1.05
t = ln 3/ln 1.05
t = 23 years
Answer:
s > 200
Step-by-step explanation:
Note that
> means greater than
< means less than
for example : 2 < 3 means 2 is less than 3
3 >2 means 3 is greater than 2
If he needs to sell more than 200, sales has to be greater than 200 = s > 200
Answer:
<em>90% confidence interval for the proportion of fans who bought food from the concession stand</em>
(0.5603,0.6529)
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Step(i)</em>:-
<em>Given sample size 'n' =300</em>
Given data random sample of 300 attendees of a minor league baseball game, 182 said that they bought food from the concession stand.
<em>Given sample proportion </em>
<em> </em>
level of significance = 90% or 0.10
Z₀.₁₀ = 1.645
<em>90% confidence interval for the proportion is determined by</em>
(0.6066 - 0.0463 ,0.6066 + 0.0463)
(0.5603,0.6529)
<u>final answer</u>:-
<em>90% confidence interval for the proportion of fans who bought food from the concession stand</em>
(0.5603,0.6529)
Answer:
A. I only
I. y>2x
Step-by-step explanation:
I. y>2x
He sold x bicycles last week and y bicycles this week, this week, he earned more than twice as much as he did last week. Therefore more than twice means greater than 2 x or
y>2x
II. y>x This is not true because y could be greater than x and less than twice of x (2x)
III. y>3 This is also not true because the least he would be earning would be $ 20 and he could get earn greater than 3 and less than $ 20 which would again be contradictory to the given statement