1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scorpion4ik [409]
3 years ago
5

Consider the legacy of Napoleon. Was he mostly a hero or mostly a tyrant? How should history view his reign? Write one to two pa

ragraphs explaining your perspective on Napoleon. Support your claims with reasons and evidence.
History
1 answer:
Tju [1.3M]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Napoleon was both a hero and a tyrant.

He was heroic when he brought law and order back to France, when the country was in chaos after the French Revolution. Then, he became a tyrant when he declared himself Emperor.

However, many of the principles that guided the French Revolution where included in his regime, and he developed a system of laws that is used in most of continental Europe to this day: the Napoelonic Code.

He got himself into many wars attempting at building a French-dominated Europe, and almost succeeded at it. He was defeated only because essentially of all Europe became his enemy, and joined forces against him.

As we can see, Napoleon is a complex and fascinating figure that cannot be classified as either a tyrant or a hero. He was both.

You might be interested in
Who’s power in the senate is most similar to the power of the speaker of the house
slavikrds [6]

Answer:

Whose power in the Senate is equal to the power of the Speaker of the House? The President Pro Tempore.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Who likes the songs S & M and Needed Me by Rhianna?
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

yes i do

Explanation:

i love it

8 0
3 years ago
Why you believe thta American revolution should be fought?
cupoosta [38]

Answer:

I think not dear ....

it is stable country

follow me guys

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the americans think the british could not fight a long war
irga5000 [103]

Answer:

because they kept losing too many men and they kept having less armory, because they thought they could get rid of americans right away but to many americans fought the british so thats how britisth gave up independence 1st

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What might happen if there were no checks and balances built into the constitution?
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

This system is called Checks and Balances and it is very important to our government. ... Without a system to prevent one branch of government from having more power over another, the government would be controlled by one group of people.

Explanation:

have a good day

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ________ made up the largest group to settle in the Mexican Cession
    13·2 answers
  • How many railroad workers were killed or injured in 1889? Why did so many workers die on the job?
    15·2 answers
  • The way in which Shiva as Lord of Dance (Nataraja) is depicted represents what traits of the Hindu culture from which it origina
    15·1 answer
  • How did the introduction of war weapons, such as the longbow and cannon affect medieval society?
    12·1 answer
  • Please help ! :-)
    10·2 answers
  • Cuando se conquisto américa
    8·1 answer
  • How did Bienville attempt to form good relationships with local American Indians? Check all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • How did some corrupt officials profit from the Catholic Church?
    10·2 answers
  • Who was Chief Justice for more than 30 years? *
    5·1 answer
  • What was a main consequence of the 18th amendment?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!