1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VladimirAG [237]
3 years ago
6

What factor was a major consideration at the time India was being partitioned

History
1 answer:
nekit [7.7K]3 years ago
3 0
Religion was a major factor leading to the partition of India. The Hindus and the Muslims could not co-exist amicably because the Hindus have a caste system. Anybody not belonging to their caste is an untouchable, an outsider or a barbarian. The extreme contrast between Hinduism and Islam made it very difficult for the Hindus to accept Muslims. Music is forbidden in Islam while festivals of the Hindus are always accompanied by music. The Muslims would not stand having the Hindus and their music pass by the mosques while the Muslims were at prayer. Hindus regard the cow as sacred while the Muslims are allowed to butcher cows and eat beef.
You might be interested in
How did the Continental Army win the Revolutionary War at the Battle of Yorktown? Both the Continental Army and the French army
oee [108]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Ways explorers helped the Indians​
aksik [14]
Explorers came to North America, they brought tremendous changes to American Indian tribes. Europeans carried a hidden enemy to the Indians: new diseases. Native peoples of America had no immunity to the diseases that European explorers and colonists brought with them.
8 0
3 years ago
Who was chosen to be president of the constitution
Stels [109]
If you mean president of the constitutional congress, it was John Hancock. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Почему ландмейстерам были необходимы вассалы?
miskamm [114]

Answer:

A vassal needed economic resources to equip the cavalry he was bound to contribute to his lord to fight his frequent wars. Such resources, in the absence of a money economy, came only from land and its associated assets, which included peasants as well as wood and water.

Russian version:

Вассалу нужны были экономические ресурсы, чтобы вооружить кавалерию, которую он должен был предоставить своему господину для ведения частых войн. Такие ресурсы, в отсутствие денежной экономики, поступали только из земли и связанных с ней активов, которые включали крестьян, а также древесину и воду.

Sorry if the translation is incorrect I had to use goo.gle translate/Извините, если перевод правильный, мне пришлось использовать гугл переводчик.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the Romans’ military equipment and how they were used
zheka24 [161]

<span>Roman military personal equipment</span> was produced in large numbers to established patterns, and it was used in an established way. These standard patterns and uses were called the res militaris or disciplina. Its regular practice during the Roman Republic and Roman Empire led to military excellence and victory. Roman equipment (especially armor) gave them "a very distinct advantage over their barbarian enemies." [1]This did not imply that every Roman soldier had better equipment than the richer men among his opponents. According to Edward Luttwak, Roman equipment was not of a better quality than that used by the majority of its adversaries.[2]

Initially, they used weapons based on Greek and Etruscan models. On encountering the Celts, they based new varieties on Celtic equipment. To defeat the Carthaginians, they constructed an entire fleet de novo based on the Carthaginian model. Once a weapon was adopted, it became standard. The standard weapons varied somewhat during Rome's long history, but the equipment and its use were never individual.

The legionary wore his sword high on the right side of his body. This enabled it to be drawn underarm with his right hand without interfering with the shield<span> which he carried in his left.</span>

A soldier carried two spears to throw at the enemy. The spears were just over two metres* long and they were designed to bend and stick in the enemy's shield so he cannot use it to protect himself. They were difficult to pull out and will bend on impact, so they couldn't be thrown back at the attacking Roman soldiers.

<span>The pugio was a small dagger used by Roman soldiers as a sidearm. It was worn on left side.</span>

<span>
</span>

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 4. Regarding the federal court system, which of the following statements is false? A. The U.S. Tax Court is a special federal co
    15·1 answer
  • What disadvantages did the British have over the colonists during the American war of independence
    9·1 answer
  • Spain's two strongest kingdoms were united when
    14·1 answer
  • Why do countries create governments
    5·1 answer
  • What more would you like to know about this period in human history?
    8·1 answer
  • Great Britain and the American colonies were interdependent. Which of the following is an example of a good which contributed to
    6·1 answer
  • Who stopped the danish invasion
    7·1 answer
  • Roy weighs 150 pounds and plans to lose
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Islamic faith have an impact on trade in Asia?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following terms gives power to the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!