The Greeks and the Romans great influenced western cultures and medieval cultures in general since the Romans were masters of war, while the Greeks were masters of art.
The terms "trial of tears" and "the place where they cried" refer to the suffering of Native Americans affected by the Indian removal act. It is estimated that the five tribes lost 1 in 4 of their population to cholera, starvation, cold and exhaustion during the move west.
Hope i helped :)
Answer:
Executive Order 9066 is an executive order issued by Franklin Delano Roosevelt following the aftermath of the bombing of Pearl Harbor in December 7, 1941, and was pointed at citizens and residents of the US in the west coast who had Japanese ancestry. The President issues, and justifies issuing this Order, by stating that there may be Japanese spies that live in the US who may, not only feed information to the Japanese on US's movements & how the US public reacts, but also sabotage the war effort. Since the hazard is great, the US decided that it would be better to have all of them interned at isolated camps then to try to find spies loyal to Japan individually. However, technically the internment is wrong, and some people of today even compare it to the Nazi's concentration camps (however, I believe there are wide differences between the two). In the end, the Order was put out for fear of destruction not only from the outside, but from within also.
~
Natural resources for example mountains made hard for Egyptian to communicate
No, the freedom of speech is one of the most important rights in a democracy along with the freedom of press. It allows several voices to rise and be heard. But it does not means that you can say whatever you want whenever you want.
You can find the foundations of the freedom of speech in the first amendment where it says:
<em>"Amendment I
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Congress </em><em>shall make no law </em><em>respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or </em><em>abridging the freedom of speech</em><em>, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" </em>
But there are exceptions to the rule. You can´t say whatever you want as the supreme court have showed in several cases. From this we can extract some categories where the first amendment doesn´t work:
- Incitement: When its directed to inciting or producing inminent lawless action.
- False statements of facts: there are some types of this unprotected according to the supreme court: those said with <em>"sufficiently culpable mental state" </em>can be subject of criminal or civil liability. Secondly libel and slander and finally negligent statements or facts can be subject of civil liability.
As a conclusion we can say that the freedom of speech is a fundamental right in a healthy democracy but we must take care of it. We can´t say whatever we want, well actually we can but you have to be responsible of your acts.
