The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Answer:
(a) 50 dB
Explanation:
It is given that someone gives training to dog that it will run for food when h whistles a 60 dB whistles and it is also given that dog will not come when he whistles a 70 dB we have to tell that when there is peak shift effect then whistle would lead to the dog fastest running.The dog will run fast for food when there is a whistle of 50 dB when thee is a peak shift effect.
so option (A) will be the correct option
The correct answer would be, Piercing the Corporate Veil.
The court may disregard the corporate structure and impose personal liability on the shareholders treating them like partners. This is called as Piercing the Corporate Veil.
Explanation:
A corporation is a form of business in which there are officers called as the board of directors, who run the business as a separate legal entity.
There are shareholders in the corporation who have their shares or stakes in the company.
When a court finds that the shareholders of a corporation are using corporate structure as a shield from liability when acting purely for personal purposes, then in this situation, the court holds the shareholders and directors, personally liable for their actions and debts. This is called as Piercing the Corporate Veil.
Learn more about Piercing the Corporate Veil at:
brainly.com/question/13800014
#LearnWithBrainly
<em>Flxriida answers </em>
(◕‿◕✿)
♡･ﾟ: *Hello!✧･ﾟ:*♡
*:･ﾟ✧*:･ﾟ✧
Answer:
difficult terrain caused issues
less harsh conditions that agrarian societies
abundant food supply during winter
Explanation:
Tried these on my OW work and it worked.
Hope this helps!! :)
