The answer would be
A. And of these in the time of most distress, there was but 6 or 7 sound persons, who, to their great commendations be it spoken, spared no pains, night nor day, but with abundance of toil and hazard of their own health, fetched them wood, made them fires, dressed them meat, made their beds, washed their loathsome clothes, clothed and unclothed them; in a word, did all the homely and necessary offices for them which dainty and queasy stomachs cannot endure to hear named; and all this willingly and cheerfully, without any grudging in the least, showing herein their true love unto their friends and brethren.
A rare example and worthy to be remembered. Two of these were Mr. William Brewster, their reverend Elder, and Myles Standish, their Captain and military commander, unto whom myself, and many others, were much beholden in our low and sick condition.
As per the given option and the sentence, option (c) would be most suitable. So, "no change is necessary" is the correct change.
Why there is no need for change in the sentence?
First of all, the options contain the same word, second of all, the sentence is structured fine just there is a need for capitalization.
Therefore, the sentence needs no change, and that leaves " no change is necessary."
Check out the link below to learn more about Sentence shange;
brainly.com/question/1825102
#SPJ1
How does the narration change again in the third section in what book/audio etc.?
A synonym could be detritus (thats if you meant wreckage and not 'wrekage')<span />