It
depicts the expectations of females and males. For example females
are expected to take care of everyone else, neglect their needs.
While the males are seemingly allowed to do whatever they desire,
have unchallenged confidence and say what they want.
<span>I
hope it helps, Regards. </span>
the answer is
Ambifuos reference.
It is not clear that the <em><u>it </u></em>as a pronoun reference refers to the fact of singing higher or being different from others.
The correct answer would be B. <span>need careers or political rights. In the 1950s, it was still a widespread view that pursuing a career or taking an active role in politics is exclusively masculine, and that it doesn't suit women. Furthermore, women who dared to enter those forbidden zones were thought of as repulsive to men. A woman could only be considered "a real woman" if she embraced the roles of wife and mother.
</span>
Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.
I believe it is A. men's.
Hope it's right!
