1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anton [14]
3 years ago
13

After World War I, how did former Ottoman territories differ from former Austro Hungarian territories

History
1 answer:
sergiy2304 [10]3 years ago
7 0

Ottoman territories were forced to pay fines for damages during the war, but Austro-Hungarian territories were not punished in any way. ... Ottoman territories came under the control of Allied powers, but Austro-Hungarian territories gained the ability to establish their own governments

You might be interested in
How did the Cold War affect Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia?<br><br> need help ASAP
NikAS [45]

Civil wars broke out

Tensions between the super powers caused tensions in other countries who relied on the super powers, for trade, and support, also for countries politically dies to these countries.

:) hope it helped

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What statements best articulates a noninterventionist argument against American imperialism
vladimir1956 [14]

The statement which best articulates a non interventionist argument against American imperialism is ''American expansion exploits the people’s of other nations''

Answer: Option B

<u>Explanation:</u>

The American rule over the other countries through ways like trade, religion or may be with the use of military forces was not liked by the people of those countries because it led to the deterioration of those economies and the exploitation of people of those countries.

Therefore people of those countries did not like it because it led to the exploitation of their resources, economy, financially and there was too much interference in the working of the government of those countries also.

4 0
3 years ago
The Compromise of 1877 involved naming Rutherford B. Hayes as president in exchange for
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

The Compromise of 1877 involved naming Rutherford B. Hayes as president in exchange for the removal of all troops in the southern states after the civil war

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was not part of the New England economy  I need an answer ASAP!!!
Mashutka [201]

Answer:

c im pretty sure

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best describes the Manhattan Project during World War II?
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
It was a large project that employed many people at several sites across the United States.
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How is Germany's location in Europe an advantage in launching an offensive an offensive war?
    15·1 answer
  • Which industry was key to the early success of english colonists
    10·1 answer
  • History of clothing<br>​
    14·2 answers
  • [Byzantine] influence might be traced along very many lines, but possibly it was the most striking in the various fields of art.
    14·2 answers
  • Homoerectus was the first human ancestor to
    7·1 answer
  • What were the differences between the Natives and the Colonizers?
    15·2 answers
  • Hello I need help how was Thomas Jefferson as President?? Was he a good president??
    9·1 answer
  • I just need 2 thru 5 asap!
    9·2 answers
  • Ik this isnt school stuff but I would like to know about how much these would be worth
    11·2 answers
  • Select all that apply to the U.S. South after 1820:
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!