Why did Germany dislike the League of Nations? think of LAMB - land, army, money and blame

History

1 answer:

melomori [17]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Germany disliked the league of nations for this reason.

Explanation:

It prevented them from violating the treaty of Versailles.

Land: Germany lost land in the World War, which although not as much as say Austria-Hungary and Russia, still humiliated the German people. They lost Alsace-Lorraine to France (Germany took Alsace-Lorraine in the Franco-Prussian War), lost parts of Prussia to Poland (most notably the polish corridor and danzig), and lost Schleswig to Denmark.

Army: Germany's army was shrunk significantly after the world war, and this was so Germany wouldn't start another world war. Germany was also not allowed to have a navy or airforce.

Money: Germany had to pay 132 Billion Gold Marks, which today is 269 Billion dollars. This is a lot of money, and the Germans, understandably, were furious. This wasn't helped at all by the Great Depression, which was mainly because the US wanted its loans back from Germany. The French and Belgian governments also wanted their money, so they raided the Uhr factories, and killed a ton of people.

Blame: Versailles would put the blame on the Germans for starting the world war, and put severe limitations on their country.

So all in all a pretty harsh treaty, but nowhere near Brest-Litovsk or the Austro-Hungarian treaty. The treaty would be the foundation for World War II, as the German people hated the outcome. This would lead to more extreme parties coming, such as Hitler's party.

After World War II, the Allied powers didn't force germany to pay because they were afraid it would cause another war.

You might be interested in

French settlers came to America for all the following reasons except:

BigorU [14]

<span>French settlers came to America for all the following reasons except adventure. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and the answer has come to your desired help.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The president is responsible for

-BARSIC- [3]

Commanding the U.S. Armed Forces

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Siddartha Guatama was:

drek231 [11]

Answer:

I believe the answer is A but check the thing again and look at his name and try and see he A,B or C

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which president became known as a “trust-buster” because of his successful challenges to monopolies under the Sherman Antitrust

klasskru [66]

The trust buster was Theodore Roosevelt

7 0

3 years ago

how did the supreme court define the role of the federal government in Marbury v. Madison (1803) and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819

Artist 52 [7]

In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to create the Second Bank of the United States and that the state of Maryland lacked the power to tax the Bank. Arguably Chief Justice John Marshall's finest opinion, McCulloch not only gave Congress broad discretionary power to implement the enumerated powers, but also repudiated, in ringing language, the radical states' rights arguments presented by counsel for Maryland.

At issue in the case was the constitutionality of the act of Congress chartering the Second Bank of the United States (BUS) in 1816. Although the Bank was controlled by private stockholders, it was the depository of federal funds. In addition, it had the authority to issue notes that, along with the notes of states' banks, circulated as legal tender. In return for its privileged position, the Bank agreed to loan the federal government money in lieu of taxes. State banks looked on the BUS as a competitor and resented its privileged position. When state banks began to fail in the depression of 1818, they blamed their troubles on the Bank. One such state was Maryland, which imposed a hefty tax on "any bank not chartered within the state." The Bank of the United States was the only bank not chartered within the state. When the Bank's Baltimore branch refused to pay the tax, Maryland sued James McCulloch, cashier of the branch, for collection of the debt. McCulloch responded that the tax was unconstitutional. A state court ruled for Maryland, and the court of appeals affirmed. McCulloch appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1819.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers