Answer:
The correct answer is C Cortes
Explanation:
There is some disagreement about exactly when the Cold War began. While the majority of historians maintain that it began as soon as World War II ended, others affirm that the beginnings of the Cold War date back to the end of World War I, in the tensions that occurred between the Russian Empire, on the one hand , and the British Empire and the United States, on the other.The ideological clash between communism and capitalism began in 1917, after the triumph of the Russian Revolution, from which Russia emerged as the first socialist country. This was one of the first events that caused considerable erosions in Russian-American relations.
Before the Russian Revolution, support for dictators was often based on promoting US economic and political priorities, such as opening foreign markets to American manufacturers. After the rise of communism, the US government also began to support authoritarian regimes that felt they were fighting against movements aligned with communism, including socialist and social democratic movements, including Latin America. belief expressed by many that this contradicts the political ideals advocated by the United States during the Cold War, while others argued that such plans were executed in fear of Communism reaching Latin America and beginning to consolidate. The support was also oriented to ensure an environment conducive to US corporate purposes abroad, such as the United Fruit Company or Standard Oil, especially when they came under the threat of democratic regimes.The support for authoritarian regimes has been justified under various ideological frameworks, such as the Truman doctrine, Kirkpatrick doctrine or the "war on drugs".
Following the cold war policies, we can say that global intervention is a long-term plan based on maintaining the country's business businesses worldwide, ensuring that the legal and economic conditions are maintained for the business to prosper and be profitable.
The Hoover quote shows that his approach to the Great Depression is one of no hope. Hoover tried to implement a couple federal works projects (like the Hoover Dam) to kick start the economy. This limited government role is thanks to Hoover's belief in laissez faire economics, which revolves around the idea that government should be involved as little as possible in the economy. With this in mind, it is easy to understand why Hoover does not give direct financial assistance to American citizens.
FDR, on the other hand, believed that the government should help in times of crisis. FDR uses this concept and develops the "New Deal." This "New Deal" is a policy in which the federal government creates several different agencies and programs to help American citizens recover from the Great Depression. This "can do"attitude reflects his determination and ties into the aforementioned quote.
Answer:
1. If it were blm protesters, there would've been shoootings, deaths, tear gas, police officers punching and kicking protesters because the way America views and treats black people, minorities, and poc. They are treated as such that their life doesn't matter and white people are superior and more important.
2. The impact of yesterday's event at the capital proves that white privilge is real. They practically walked into the capital. The difference between that and blm protests is blm supporters are fighting for racial injustice and the trump supporters who raided and destroyed the capital are throwing tantrums cause trump lost. Especially the fact that the president of the US ENCOURAGED them to destroy and raid the capital. And many important people were inside and could've been killed like Mike Pence for instance. He put his on VP in danger. And the trump supporters at the capital were breaking the law by breaking in, smashing desks, stealing mail (which is fraud btw), and be all kinds of violent for what? because trump lost. And they only got treated a fraction of what blm supporters would've been treated
3. No i completely disagree with the methods of the "protesters" at the capital. They werent even protesters. They were criminals and rioters. Breaking the law. There are many other ways they could've done it. They could've simply had a peaceful protest like many BLM supporters did.
Explanation:
Answer:
“The heart that gives thanks is a happy one, for we cannot feel thankful and unhappy at the same time.” — Douglas Wood
Explanation:
When were for everything grateful for everything or appreciate everone with a smile doesnt meant entirely that were happy just like that it takes time to learn to be happy we have to be grateful for little things in life. Us humans are not meant to be happy and the time it is impossible to live sadness because everyone has a story.
