A literature class
Hope this helps and please leave 5 stars :)
Answer:
We met on my first day at my “new” job, management had paired me up with him for training. Everything turned into laughter and jokes. We started eating lunch together every day in the cafe.
A couple weeks later, he asked me out to lunch outside of the office for the first time.
2 weeks later we seperated then a few months after that we saw eachother at the cafe and beacame friends again
Explanation:
The phrase helps to conclude the text and does not add to the writing. ... The phrase adds a specific detail about time that is relevant to the text's topic. The phrase helps to introduce the text's topic by providing a direct object.
N. Scott Momaday
Referencing the trail he followed to understand the tales of his grandmother.
Commons
“How did Faulkner pull it off?” is a question many a fledgling writer has asked themselves while struggling through a period of apprenticeship like that novelist John Barth describes in his 1999 talk "My Faulkner." Barth “reorchestrated” his literary heroes, he says, “in search of my writerly self... downloading my innumerable predecessors as only an insatiable green apprentice can.” Surely a great many writers can relate when Barth says, “it was Faulkner at his most involuted and incantatory who most enchanted me.” For many a writer, the Faulknerian sentence is an irresistible labyrinth. His syntax has a way of weaving itself into the unconscious, emerging as fair to middling imitation.
While studying at Johns Hopkins University, Barth found himself writing about his native Eastern Shore Maryland in a pastiche style of “middle Faulkner and late Joyce.” He may have won some praise from a visiting young William Styron, “but the finished opus didn’t fly—for one thing, because Faulkner intimately knew his Snopses and Compsons and Sartorises, as I did not know my made-up denizens of the Maryland marsh.” The advice to write only what you know may not be worth much as a universal commandment. But studying the way that Faulkner wrote when he turned to the subjects he knew best provides an object lesson on how powerful a literary resource intimacy can be