The correct answer is C. It supports the idea that the burglary was related to politics.
Indeed, the article is about the crime of breaking and entering into the Democratic Party’s offices located in the Watergate Building, by five individuals hired by important members of the Nixon administration and the Republican Party. This context helps interpret their motives and prosecutors surely knew the crime was politically motivated. However, this particular piece of testimony from one of the defendants proves the political motivations of the crime. Nixon pretended initially that this was a common burglary, this statement proves him wrong.
Republican have always been staunch anti-communists/leftists and they have always accused Democrats of being “commie sympathizers”. This type of discourse proves the political affiliation of the burglars.
C) The burglars were politics related. I didn't read the article, but this is probably most related to Nixon's Watergate scandal.
A is incorrect because they are anti-communist, so wouldn't support Cuba. B is a logical fallacy and completely unrelated to the article. D is wrong for obvious reasons: teamwork isn't the main idea of the article.
John would have preferred not to sit in the honor place beside the driver. hope i help don't forget to go subscribe to king kevin on youtube its my channel i have 840 subscribers plz go subscribe and be active thank you. Brainliest right.
