Answer:
I will dscuss this onn this 3 points:
1. Confederation war
2. Secession from the south
3. Slavery
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of USA, was among the most respected presidents to have ruled the con federal state of USA. He ruled from 1861 until his assassination in 1865.
His victory at the poll was greeted with secession drive by the southern sates, whose major purpose of the secession demand was the fear of abolition of slave trade. He assured the Southern secessionists of his unwillingness to abolish slaver across America but supported law that will limit them within their immediate territories. Fall out from the agitation was the American civil war fought between the North and the South.
However, in his second term he signed the amendment to abolish slave trade in the United States. The abolition and the emancipation of slaves was later regarded as the goal of the Union war
After his ingratiation he was grappled with the civil war. There were demands from the states of the south for secession. He took permission from the congress to suspend the constitution in other to have upper hand to suppress the secession sympathizers from South. His second victory at polls gave him opportunity to further unite the union. He was later regarded as the saviour of the union.
Courageous behavior, especially in battle.
or, polite attention or respect given by men to women.
Answer:
What is the question? I am eager to help! :D
Explanation:
Please give me brainliest :)
Answer:
- Roosevelt appeals to the emotions of the audience by referring to Hitler’s rise to power and the tragic consequences of his government.
- Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by noting that the interests of the people are not considered in a one-party government.
- Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by explaining reasons why the amendment would allow the Soviets to ignore a human right.
In this excerpt, Eleanor Roosevelt explains why a compromise on human rights issues is often equivalent to nullifying the protection. She does this by first describing an issue in which compromising (with the Soviets) would eliminate the protection of the right. She also appeals to the logic of the listeners when she explains that in one-party systems, the rights of citizens are often ignored. Finally, she emphasizes this fact by reminding the reader of Hitler's regime and its consequences.
Answer:
The predicate is spilled the milk on the kitchen floor.
Explanation:
The subject talks about who the person was or thing. The predicate is pretty much the rest of the sentence.
