Media coverage gives voters an impression of the candidates.
Because much of media coverage comes in very brief news segments and even short "sound bites," it tends to provide an impression of the candidates, without necessarily providing in-depth presentation and analysis of their views. This varies, of course, depending on which "media" you have in mind with the question. Committed news organizations which employ highly skilled journalists will do deeper pieces on candidates and their views or policies -- see, for instance, articles in The New York Times or Washington Post or The Atlantic.
There are many new forms of media--such as social media websites and politically-aligned cable networks--where people can go to get biased perspectives and be told how to vote or not to vote. But the most respected media outets strive to present a full picture and cover all candidates. Still, because most voters will watch or read only portions of news media coverage, the best answer is that media tends to give voters an impression of candidates -- which sometimes is less complete than the full picture.
The correct answers are A) Align the design so it looks balanced, B) keep the slide from being cluttered, D) use colors to highlight, and E) use decorative design so the slide is not boring.
<em>The elements that are important for achieving a good design on a slide are: Align the design so it looks balanced, keep the slide from being cluttered, use colors to highlight, and use decorative design so the slide is not boring. </em>
When making a powerpoint presentation is very important to take into consideration that your slides presentation are your visual support. The slides do not need to be full of information, words, or paragraphs. No. Every slide is the visual support of your explanation. So it is highly recommended that you add pictures, video, graphics, or any visual element that complements your explanation.
I would say the correct answer is <span>B) Immigration, economic reform and unemployment rates post-recession, and political elitism and nationalism that created bipartisan within Parliament. According to the author, immigration wasn't the downright cause, but only a trigger in an atmosphere of rising nationalism, not only in Britain but throughout the world. Economic reform and unemployment rates after the recession have brought skepticism and distrust in European financial and political institutions. Thirdly and lastly, the author interprets Brexit as a consequence of resentment against political elites. Two parties (Labour and Conservative) officially wanted Britain to remain in the EU, but many people who had previously been supporters of these parties were for Brexit, which caused a great disunity.</span>
I believe the answer is letter A. Natural rights.
