All categories

4 years ago

Careers in the Transportation, Distribution & Logistics Career Cluster include:

Business

2 answers:

stealth61 [152]4 years ago

4 0

accountant

survey researcher

loan officer

cargo and

freight agent

general manager

executive secretary

storage and

distribution manager

purchasing agent

Explanation:

damaskus [11]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

shipping and receiving manager

cargo freight inspector

Explanation:

The shipping and receiving manager typically oversees a staff, as well as develops and/or helps enforce a company's policies for accurate intake of new shipments; this typically involves conducting inspections of arriving goods, noting their quantities, and ensuring they are stored properly. And

A freight and cargo inspector inspects, manages and documents freight shipments and verifies that the contents are in compliance with local, national and international regulations. Some freight and cargo inspectors work only with a specific type of freight - for example, automobiles - while others work with a range of shipment types.

You might be interested in

Kragan Clothing Company manufactures its own designed and labeled athletic wear and sells its products through catalog sales and

aev [14]

Answer:

1. $276,500

2. $328,950

Explanation:

1. Computation for the selling costs to be assigned to the "high-intensity" line of athletic wear for the month of March using the traditional product costing system

Traditional product costing = $395,000 * 70%

Traditional product costing = $276,500

Therefore the selling costs to be assigned to the "high-intensity" line of athletic wear for the month of March using the traditional product costing system is $276,500

2. Computation for the selling costs to be assigned to the "high-intensity" line of athletic wear for the month of March using activity-based costing

Activity based costing :

Sales commissions ($940,000*$0.05) $47,000

Advertising - TV (230*$300) $69,000

Advertising - internet (2,000*$10) 20,000

Catalogs (62,400*$2.50) $156,000

Cost of catalog sales (8,750*$1) 8,750

Credit and collection ($940,000*$0.03) $28,200

Selling cost $328,950

Therefore the selling costs to be assigned to the "high-intensity" line of athletic wear for the month of March using activity-based costing is $328,950

6 0

3 years ago

Mar. 29 Received a $30,000, 60-day, 5% note dated March 29 from Karie Platt on account.

dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

Explanation:

Date Description Post. Ref. Debit Credit Assets Liabilities Equity

1 Mar.29 Notes receivable 30000 30000

2 Accounts receivable-Karie Platt 30000 -30000

3 Apr.30 Notes receivable 24000 24000

4 Accounts receivable-Jon Kelly 24000 -24000

5 May.28 Accounts receivable-Karie Platt 30250 30250

6 Notes receivable 30000 -30000

7 Income Summary ($30000 x 5% x 60/360) 250 250

8 Jun.29 Accounts receivable-Jon Kelly 24320 24320

9 Notes receivable 24000 -24000

10 Income Summary ($24000 x 8% x 60/360) 320 320

11 Aug.26 Cash 30855 30855

12 Accounts receivable-Karie Platt 30250 -30250

13 Income Summary ($30250 x 8% x 90/360) 605 605

14 Oct.22 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 24320 24320

15 Accounts receivable-Jon Kelly 24320 -24320

163745 163745 1175 0 1175

5 0

4 years ago

Two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. The government has decided to reduce the pollution a

LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

It is likely that C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

Explanation:

So two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air, and from now on each one will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution emitted into the air.
Each firm gets 40 pollution permits, which it can either use or sell to the other firm. That means that if both firms choose to keep their respective 40 permits, they would still have to reduce the pollution by 60 tons (100 minus 40 is 60).
It costs Firm A $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. Because it costs so much to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm A to get as many pollution permits as possible, as long as they get them for less than $200 each.
It costs Firm B $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. Since here it costs less to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm B to sell as many pollution permits as possible, as long as they sell for higher than $100.

With that in mind, the outcome that makes the most sense would be Option C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200. This way both firms spend the least amount of money while at the same time pleasing the government.

To demonstrate it, let's do some actual calculations for each case.

Case A) Both firms will use their own pollution permits.

In this case, each firm will have to independently reduce their pollutants by 60 tons, as noted before. That represents a high cost, as we will now determine:

For Firm A, the cost would be

$60tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}=12000dollars$

For Firm B, the cost would be

$60tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}=6000dollars$

Case B) Firm A will buy some of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost less than $100.

Since Firm B could spend $100 to reduce a ton of pollution, it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $100 each: If Firm B sold its pollution permits for less than $100 each, it would have to reduce even more tons of pollutants (spending $100 for each one), and would end up losing money! Let's say it sold 10 pollution permits for $90 each, so it would have to reduce 70 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm B (Case B):

$70tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}-(10*90dollars)=6100dollars$

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm B in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Case D) Firm B will buy all of Firm A's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

This is a similar case than Case B, in the sense that since it costs Firm A so much to reduce a ton of pollutant ($200 for each one), it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $200 each, or it would end up losing money as well. Let's say Firm A sold all of its 40 pollution permits for $150 each, and so it would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm A (Case D):

$100tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}-(40*150dollars)=14000dollars$

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm A in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Finally, Case C) Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

As mentioned before, this one makes the most sense because both firms would spend the least amount of money. Let's determine the total costs for each one, knowing that:

Firm A would buy 40 pollutant permits from Firm B, for (let's say) $150 each.
Firm A would still need to reduce 20 tons of pollutants. And
Firm B would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants, instead of 60.

Cost for Firm A (Case C):

$(20tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton})+(40*150dollars)=10000dollars$

Which is less than the $12000 Cost calculated in Case A.

Cost for Firm B (Case C):

$(100tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton})-(40*150dollars)=4000dollars$

Which is less than the $6000 Cost calculated in Case A.

Since both firms each spend $2000 less in Case C than in case A, it would make sense for them to follow this option.

4 0

3 years ago

"Creating a signature scent, choosing an original name, and configuring the shape and look of the bottle are all decisions made

ss7ja [257]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Creating a signature scent, choosing an original name and configuring thr shape of and look of the bottle are decisions made during the product conceptualization stage.

Before a product is finally available to consumers, the product goes through certain steps. These steps ranges from product development, product conceptualization, to launching, etc.

During the conceptualization stage, the name of a product, the form of the product as well as other appearance related works are the main objectives during the project conceptualization cycle.

I hope this helps.

5 0

3 years ago

In building a sustainable organization, management should strive to make the organization sustainable in three areas ? ________.

DochEvi [55]

The three areas are; "the economy, the environment, and society".

Sustainability organizations are composed of groups of individuals that plan to propel sustainability or potentially those activities of sorting out something economically. Dissimilar to numerous business associations, sustainability associations are not restricted to actualizing sustainability methodologies which furnish them with financial and social advantages accomplished through ecological duty. For these associations or organizations, sustainability can likewise be an end in itself without additional explanations.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers