Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Return on the stock = (Dividend ÷ Investment) + (capital gain ÷ investment
)
= (Dividend ÷ Investment) + (Final price of the stock - initial price of the stock) ÷ Investment
10 = (1 ÷ 20) × 100 + ((final price - 20) ÷ 20) × 100
10 = 5 + 5 × ( final price - 20)
Final price = 21
Therefore, the stock price should increase by [(21 - 20) ÷ 20] × 100
= 5%
No, there is not any requirement of recording when the fair value of bonds decreases to $6000000 on December 31 of the current year.
Given that Starbucks purchased bonds with $ 7 million face value at par for cash on July 1 of the current year and the bonds pay 7 percent interest the following June 30 and December 31 and mature in three years.
We are required to tell whether there is requirement of any recording when the fair value of bonds decreases to $6000000 on December 31 of the current year.
A bond is basically a debt security, similar to an IOU and borrowers issue bonds to raise money from investors willing to lend them money for a certain amount of time. When we buy a bond, we are lending to the issuer, which may be a government, municipality, or corporation.
There is not any requirement of any recording when the fair value decreases to $600000 because it is not affecting our books of accounts because in our books they are recorded at face values.
Hence there is not any requirement of recording when the fair value of bonds decreases to $6000000 on December 31 of the current year.
Learn more about bonds at brainly.com/question/25965295
#SPJ4
Hey friends
I believe the answer to this question would be A
Hope i helped
~Katie
Answer:
Invest
invest
Explanation:
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing
firm a can either earn20 or 70 if it advertises or 5 or 50 if it does not advertise. this is the same for firm B.
Thus the option that would yield the highest payoff is for both firms to advertise.
this is an example of prisoners dilemma
Answer:
Luther Corporation
Current Ratio for 2006 is closest to:
1.1 : 1
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Total Current Assets = $144 million
Total Current Liabilities = $132 million
Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilities
= $144/$132
= 1.1 : 1
b) Luther Corporation's current ratio is a liquidity measure that shows Luther's ability to pay off short-term obligations worth $132 million or those due within one year with its current assets of $144 million. The ratio tells investors and analysts of Luther Corporation how Luther can use its current assets to pay off its current debts. Since Luther's current ratio is higher than 1, it is considered good, depending on the industry average. This means that Luther's current ratio of 1.1 : 1 should not be considered in isolation, but in comparison with other firms in the industry and its performance over a number of years.
