1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zubka84 [21]
3 years ago
5

How does zinn describe the american revolution? 2. in what way was colonial military service unfair to poor common people? 3. ge

orge washington's response to soldiers who rebelled. 4. historian charles beard?
History
1 answer:
frutty [35]3 years ago
6 0
You could say Howard Zinn is a Social Historian. He looks at events in history and the social impact they have on the people and time. Zinn saw the Revolution as an avoidable war. He doesn't see war as a necessity to gaining what one wants. 
The common poor soldier didn't benefit near what the richer classes did. According to Zinn, people were promised things that they never received. Others were bullied into joining the cause. Washington was brutal to those soldiers that deserted. We have a very idealized view of him. Zinn points out that the common soldier had very little while the officers like Washington were eating large meals, constantly had access to fine clothes, and never lacked for shelter. The common soldier never knew if he would eat during the early parts of the war. Everything surrounding Valley Forge is true. Many men died due to lack of food and exposure to the elements. 

Charles Beard looked more at the economics of the situation. He saw all the decisions made based on the economic impact it would have on those making the decisions (wealthy and elite). Beard was part of the Progressive interpretation of history; basically they analyzed the actions and decisions around the idea of class and money. Those in power took actions to maintain their place in power without the common man realizing it. 
You might be interested in
All rivers in chile flow from north to south​
postnew [5]

Answer:

TRUE

Explanation:

All rivers in Chile flow from north to south

5 0
3 years ago
Explain the respective goals of the United States and North Vietnam during the Vietnam War.​
Alik [6]

Answer:

The main goal was to contain communion in Southeast Asia. The US failed to achieve this goal because it wasn't willing to sacrifice as much to win the war as the Vietnamese communists were.

5 0
3 years ago
Close to nine million people live in the Pacific Islands.<br> a. True<br> b. False
Katena32 [7]
This is true; this number is the estimate from the years 2003- 2010. About 7 Million of these people are of Micronesian descent, including from Papua Guinea and Fiji..
5 0
3 years ago
Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers?
Bingel [31]

Federalists argue for a separation of powers because B.The president should have more power than the other branches.

<h3>Further explanation </h3>

Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers?

A. No single branch of government would have too much power.

B.The president should have more power than the other branches.

C.Power would be divided equally between federal and state government.

D.Trying to balance three branches of government would be impossible.

The Federalists wanted a strong government and also strong executive branch. They also did not want a bill of rights because they thought the new constitution was sufficient.

During the founding of the country, the federalists were ideologically pitted against the anti-federalists. The federalists favored a stronger central (federal) government because of the precursor to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave no strength to the national government. It couldn't tax the states and had to rely on donations from the states for funds. And also there was no central army and many feared the return of the British, which they did in the War of 1812.

Federalists argued that the separation of powers and checks and balances system created in the new  Constitution protected the people. No one group could control the other two. They argue that the separation of powers into three independent branches protected the rights of the  people. Each branch represents a different aspect of the people, and because all three  branches are equal, no one group can assume control over another.

<h3> </h3><h3>Learn more</h3>
  1. Learn more about Federalists brainly.com/question/3230108

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Grade:  9

Subject:  history

Chapter:  Federalists

Keywords:  Federalists

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under the affordable care act, the individual mandate:
Oxana [17]

Answer:

This act requires most Americans to have health insurance or pay a tax penalty

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mesopotamia was the location for an empire founded by
    14·2 answers
  • HELP
    5·1 answer
  • The Chavin de Huantar is an archaeological site that holds important information about Chavin culture. Archaeologists have found
    14·2 answers
  • The 14,115-foot Colorado mountain named
    8·2 answers
  • compare great Britain's level of involvement before and after the French and Indian War, in terms of governing their American co
    9·1 answer
  • What was the main issue relating to Reconstruction that divided Republicans at the end of the Civil War? If you had been a membe
    9·2 answers
  • I really need help with this!!!!!!! please! Anyone!
    10·1 answer
  • Which allied nation promise to aid the United States against the Japanese
    6·1 answer
  • The roosevelt corollary to the monroe doctorine called for
    15·2 answers
  • The ancient Indus Valley civilization was replaced shortly after 2000 BCE by the
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!