When it comes to television journalism as a means of forming public opinion, it is extremely powerful, even more powerful than radio journalism. Such information should be examined and edited, forming one's own opinion, and of course hearing more than one source. Any reporting within TV journalism implies a favor of a political option, and the incorporation of what it wants to emphasize by various techniques. What is not true avbout TV journalism is: we should form our opinions by listening to network commentators to get a well-rounded perspective.
The closest answer would be C. They wanted to escape poverty in England and find opportunity in America. They also wanted to flee from religious persecution.
Answer:
Does the author or agency that created the information have the credentials, academic background, or experience to write authoritatively about the topic?
Authors:
Google their name(s)...do they have a degree related to the topic they are addressing?
Watch out for people with degrees (MA, MS, PhD) in a field unrelated to what they are writing about. A PhD in English does not qualify someone to give medical advice, for instance.
Agencies:
Google their name...do they have a good reputation in the field they are addressing?
Are they really taking responsibility for a particular website or certain resource? In the case of websites, sometimes university web pages are "official" and sometimes they belong solely to students or staff or faculty. To learn how to tell the difference, visit our "How can I "read" a URL or website address?" answer.
See also: What is a good way to find information about the authority or qualifications of an author?
Explanation:
Answer:
The possibility of amending the Constitution helped ensure its ratification, although many feared the powerful federal government it created would deprive them of their rights. To allay their anxieties, the framers promised that a Bill of Rights safeguarding individual liberties would be added following ratification
Answer:
3. Reason
Explanation:
Many of the ancient philosophers thought the reason to be the core of humanity and wisdom, the most important characteristics.
<u>Plato’s </u><u>teachings divided the soul into three parts: will, appetite and reason</u>. These parts could clash (our earning and appetite could clash over reason or willpower clashes with the wants), <u>but to operate correctly reason should rule over all other aspects of a person's character</u>. Passion and spirit should never rule over human reason.
<u>Aristotle</u><u>, who was Plato’s student, adopted this idea</u>. He was the one who <u>defined people as rational animals</u> stating that what separates people from other creatures is exactly the<u> possibility to think reasonably. </u>
