1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lukranit [14]
3 years ago
8

What is not an example of a stage direction

English
2 answers:
Juliette [100K]3 years ago
4 0
D) Cassius fears Anthony  
podryga [215]3 years ago
4 0
The Correct And Best Answer is D) Cassius fears Anthony
You might be interested in
Pls help me! I’m stuck on this problem! I will give points to whoever make this clear! Thank you!
lions [1.4K]

Answer: he went through a lot (c)

Explanation: Conventional quantum field theories work well in describing the results of experiments at high-energy particle smashers such as CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, where the Higgs was discovered, which probe matter at its smallest scales. But if you want to understand how things work in many less esoteric situations – how electrons move or don’t move through a solid material and so make a material a metal, an insulator or a semiconductor, for example – things get even more complex.

The billions upon billions of interactions in these crowded environments require the development of “effective field theories” that gloss over some of the gory details. The difficulty in constructing such theories is why many important questions in solid-state physics remain unresolved – for instance why at low temperatures some materials are superconductors that allow current without electrical resistance, and why we can’t get this trick to work at room temperature.

But beneath all these practical problems lies a huge quantum mystery. At a basic level, quantum physics predicts very strange things about how matter works that are completely at odds with how things seem to work in the real world. Quantum particles can behave like particles, located in a single place; or they can act like waves, distributed all over space or in several places at once. How they appear seems to depend on how we choose to measure them, and before we measure they seem to have no definite properties at all – leading us to a fundamental conundrum about the nature of basic reality.

This fuzziness leads to apparent paradoxes such as Schrödinger’s cat, in which thanks to an uncertain quantum process a cat is left dead and alive at the same time. But that’s not all. Quantum particles also seem to be able to affect each other instantaneously even when they are far away from each other. This truly bamboozling phenomenon is known as entanglement, or, in a phrase coined by Einstein (a great critic of quantum theory), “spooky action at a distance”. Such quantum powers are completely foreign to us, yet are the basis of emerging technologies such as ultra-secure quantum cryptography and ultra-powerful quantum computing.

But as to what it all means, no one knows. Some people think we must just accept that quantum physics explains the material world in terms we find impossible to square with our experience in the larger, “classical” world. Others think there must be some better, more intuitive theory out there that we’ve yet to discover.

In all this, there are several elephants in the room. For a start, there’s a fourth fundamental force of nature that so far quantum theory has been unable to explain. Gravity remains the territory of Einstein’s general theory of relativity, a firmly non-quantum theory that doesn’t even involve particles. Intensive efforts over decades to bring gravity under the quantum umbrella and so explain all of fundamental physics within one “theory of everything” have come to nothing.

Meanwhile cosmological measurements indicate that over 95 per cent of the universe consists of dark matter and dark energy, stuffs for which we currently have no explanation within the standard model, and conundrums such as the extent of the role of quantum physics in the messy workings of life remain unexplained. The world is at some level quantum – but whether quantum physics is the last word about the world remains an open question.

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/definition/quantum-physics/#ixzz6v8lQ13km

6 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt below and answer the question.
dedylja [7]
The point the king is trying to make is, essentially, that while what Hitler did was considered legal and while what the Hungarian Freedom Fighters did was illegal, it is all a matter of human rights. While what Hitler did may have been legal, it was not morally correct to kill 6 million people. And while it was illegal to aid the Jews and provide comfort, it is morally correct to help these people in a time of need, as stated by the golden rule of every religion, do unto others as you would like to have done to you. It is mostly based on what people believe is correct and if certain people believed what Hitler believed, they would not have that certain moral correctness. So in standing up for what you believe in, a change can be made based on the actions; illegal or not.
8 0
3 years ago
What’s has course hero
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

The summary on the given topic is summarized throughout the explanation portion below.

Explanation:

  • A web-based witness or experience along with more approximately Twenty million distinct lecture material held throughout common by a participant as well as the educational congregation.
  • This becomes our mission to enable people grad with confidence and preparation as well as to build this goal by facilitating the interactions among graduates or participants.
5 0
3 years ago
When writing dialogue, with what type of speech would you be most likely to use slang?
xxTIMURxx [149]

Casual form, hope this help!☺️

4 0
3 years ago
What are the points of comparison used to compare the House of Representatives and the senate?
zimovet [89]

Answer:

Explanation: the House of Representatives. The House has the power to impeach (formally accuse) while the Senate tries impeachments. In addition, the Senate approves treaties and certain presidential appointments, such as ambassadors and Supreme Court Justices.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does the subject of a sentence indicate? A. who or what B. when or where C. why or how D. when or why
    9·1 answer
  • When selecting the best financial institution for you, you should consider each of these factors except _____. minimum balance s
    9·2 answers
  • I am
    10·1 answer
  • Byron uses a poetic technique called _____ to force the reader to _____. A. enjambment; move from one line to the next without p
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP SUPER IMPORTANT!!!
    5·1 answer
  • What motivates Zhu Wenli to sing revolutionary songs instead of Uigur folk songs?
    13·1 answer
  • What reason does hillenbrand give for japan's plans to conquer new land?
    13·1 answer
  • What do doctors do to treat their patients to treat them well??
    11·1 answer
  • Hey guys konsi country me jayada kamine ya chutiye milenge
    14·2 answers
  • What is the difference between explicit and implicit ideas?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!