1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marat540 [252]
3 years ago
9

The Signal Company has operating income (EBIT) before depreciation expense of $1,500,000. The company’s depreciation expense is

$400,000, and it has a 25% tax rate.A. If the company is 100% equity financed (zero debt), calculate its net income and net cash flow.B. If the company (instead) has $100,000 in annual interest expense, recalculate the net income and net cash flow.C. Explain the difference in your answers to parts A & B – specifically, reconcile the change in net cash flow that occurred.
Business
1 answer:
ANEK [815]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. Net income is $825,000; and Net cash flow is $1,225,000.

B. Net income is $750,000; and Net cash flow is $1,150,000.

C. Parts A net cash flow will equal part B net cash flow by deducting $75,000 difference, or Parts B net cash flow will equal part A net cash flow by addiing $75,000 difference.

Explanation:

The following are given:

Operating income (EBIT) before depreciation expense = $1,500,000

Depreciation expense = $400,000

Tax rate = 25%

We therefore proceed as follows:

A. If the company is 100% equity financed (zero debt), calculate its net income and net cash flow.

<u>Calculation of net income</u>

Income after depreciation but before tax = Operating income (EBIT) before depreciation expense - Depreciation expense = $1,500,000 - $400,000 = $1,100,000

Tax expense = Income after depreciation but before tax * Tax rate = $1,100,000 * 25% = $275,000

Net income = Income after depreciation but before tax - Tax expenses = $1,100,000 - $275,000 = $825,000

<u>Calculation of net cash flow</u>

Net cash flow = Net income + Depreciation expense = $825,000 - $400,000 = $1,225,000

B. If the company (instead) has $100,000 in annual interest expense, recalculate the net income and net cash flow.

<u>Calculation of net income</u>

Income after depreciation and interest expenses but before tax = Operating income (EBIT) before depreciation expense - Depreciation expense - Interest expense = $1,500,000 - $400,000 - $100,000 = $1,000,000

Tax expense = Income after depreciation and interest expense but before tax * Tax rate = $1,000,000 * 25% = $250,000

Net income = Income after depreciation and interest expense but before tax - Tax expenses = $1,000,000 - $250,000 = $750,000

<u>Calculation of net cash flow</u>

Net cash flow = Net income + Depreciation expenses = $750,000 + $400,000 = $1,150,000

C. Explain the difference in your answers to parts A & B – specifically, reconcile the change in net cash flow that occurred.

Difference in net income = Part A net income - Part B net income = $825,000 - $750,000 = $75,000

Difference in net cash flow = Part A net cash flow - Part B net cash flow = $1,225,000 - $1,150,000 = $75,000

Each of Part A net income and net cash flow is $75,000 greater than part B because part A is an 100% equity financed with the need to pay annual interest expense on debt of $100,000 like in Part B before calculating the Tax expense and the net income.

The $75,000 diffence is as a result of additional tax that Part A has to paid on $100,000. That is,

Additional tax expense in part A = Interest expense not paid in Part A * Tax rate = $100,000 * 25% = $25,000

Diffrenrence = Intererest expense not paid in part A - Additional tax expense = $100,000 - $25,000 = $75,000

For example, if there is no annual interest of $100,000 to be paid in part B, we can then reconcile by just addinf back the difference as follows:

Part B new net cash flow = Part B initial cash flow + Difference in net cash flow = $1,150,000 + $75,000 =  $1,225,000 = Part A net cash flow

Also, if annual interest expense has to be paid in part A as a result of being now financed by debt, we will just deduct the difference as follows:

Part A new net cash flow = Part A initial cash flow - Difference in net cash flow = $1,225,000 -  $75,000 =  $1,150,000 = Part B initial net cash flow.

You might be interested in
At Groovy Rags, a trendy retail store, manager Eon Forcer doesn't waste any time thinking about whether the employees on his shi
matrenka [14]

Answer:

Theory X.

Explanation:

In this scenario, Groovy Rags, a trendy retail store, manager Eon Forcer doesn't waste any time thinking about whether the employees on his shift get their breaks at a reasonable time. In fact, he claims he is hard pressed to determine which one has "worked hard enough" to even deserve a break. Earlier today, Eon remarked, "I've never met one that likes this job! They're only biding their time and here for the money." Eon's managerial style would be classified as Theory X.

Douglas McGregor developed the theory x and y in the 1950s while working at the MIT Sloan school of management.

Theory X suggests that employees working in a particular organization dislike work, possess minimal ambition, and are generally not willing to take up responsibility.

Hence, with the Theory X it is very important and essential that these employees be supervised and rewarded externally with prizes and punishment should be used when they err.

4 0
3 years ago
On July 1, 2020, Indigo Co. pays $9,400 to Sweet Insurance Co. for a 2-year insurance policy. Both companies have fiscal years e
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Explanation:

The journal entries are shown below:

On July 1

Prepaid insurance A/c Dr $9,400

    To Cash A/c $9,400

(Being the prepaid insurance for cash is recorded)

On December 31

Insurance expense A/c Dr $2,350

         To Prepaid insurance A/c $2,350

(Being the insurance expense is recorded)

The computation is shown below:

= Prepaid insurance amount ÷ number of years × number of months ÷ total number of months in a year

= $9,400 ÷ 2 years × 6 months ÷ 12 months

= $2,350

6 0
3 years ago
One of the three economic questions deals with deciding what goods and services should be produced. what the costs of production
abruzzese [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is What Goods and Services should be produced.

Explanation:

The problem ‘what to produce’ can be divided into two related questions. First, which goods are to be produced and which not; and second, in what quantities those goods, which the economy has decided to produce, are to be produced. If productive resources were unlimited we could produce as many numbers of goods as we liked and, therefore, the question “What goods to be produced and what not” would not have arisen. But because resources are in fact scarce relative to human wants, an economy must choose among different alternative collections of goods and services that it should produce.

If the Society decides to produce particular goods in a larger quantity, it will have to withdraw resources from the production of some other goods. Further, an economy has to decide how much resources should be allocated for the production of consumer goods and how much for capital goods. In other words, an economy has to decide the respective quantities of consumer goods and capital goods to be produced.

The choice between consumer goods and capital goods involves the choice between the present and the future. If the society decides to produce more capital goods, some resources will have to be taken away from the production of consumer goods and. therefore, the production of consumer goods would have to be cut down. But greater amount of capital goods would make possible the production of larger quantities of consumer goods in the future. Thus, we see that some current consumption has to be sacrificed for the sake of more consumption in the future.

6 0
4 years ago
Supplemental liquidity providers (slps) trade securities on behalf of:
ivanzaharov [21]

SLPS trade securities on their own behalf (not for someone else).

5 0
3 years ago
When might adding an additional employee be bad for a small business?
Anarel [89]

Answer:

If the demand for the product or services goes down

Explanation:

A reduction in demand for a good or service results in a decline in its price. As per the law of supply and demand, a decline in demand while holding other factors constant pushing the equilibrium price down. Reduced prices mean that the revenues obtained from the sales of the product or service will decline.

Hiring an extra worker when the demand is low will lead to losses. Low demand causes low prices, which implies that the cost of the new employee will be greater than the benefits obtained from the worker.  A reduction in prices will mean that the marginal product of labor will be lower than the cost of labor.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When a business association holds itself out to others as being a corporation when it has made no attempt to , the firm normally
    12·2 answers
  • If the interest earned by a CD is compounded annually, which rule is most accurate when calculating how long it will take the mo
    10·2 answers
  • Cost-benefit analysis is similar to which of the following?
    12·2 answers
  • Materials derived from natural resources clearly defines which of the following?
    10·1 answer
  • Yesterday, you entered into a futures contract to sell €62,500 at $1.50 per €. Your initial performance bond is $1,500 and your
    13·1 answer
  • Establishing rules that will help you stay focused is called
    8·2 answers
  • Assume that beer is an inferior good. If the price of beer​ falls, then the substitution effect results in the person buying​ __
    8·1 answer
  • You have just signed a contract for your rental property and you will make monthly payments at the beginning of each month. Your
    13·1 answer
  • My question is how much do you love Jesus
    11·1 answer
  • Assume US GAAP to answer this question. In 2017, $2 million in wages were earned and no cash wages were paid. In 2018, $8 millio
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!