The difference is, is that they’re not the same person. They are several different people
Answer: Three of the ideas that helped to make the design of the American government were; Natural rights, The power to govern and the purpose of government, and The purpose of government is to protect the rights of citizens.
Explanation:
John Locke had several ideas that helped to design the United States government. He lived during the 17th century. He has the nickname of "The father of Liberal philosophy. The American Revolution was based solely on the ideas of this man.
James Madison was also an integral part of the designing of the United States government. He would serve in the Congress, become a President, and his Virginia Plan was key to the Constitution.
The study of communication through body movements, stances, gestures, and facial expressions is known as kinesics.
<h2>What is non-verbal communication?</h2>
Although nonverbal communication is a common occurrence in cultures, rules and symbols are still used. Kinesics is the study of body language, which includes gestures, facial emotions, movements of the body, and positions. A facial expression could be inconsistent with verbal communication; hand gestures emphasize points. Voice volume and tone improve our ability to communicate. Even complete silence can be a powerful tool for communicating.
Culture-specific body language exists. Different cultures can interpret the same body language and gestures differently. In North America, for example, the sign for the stop is to hold your hand out, fingers grouped together, palm facing outward. Similar behavior is extremely offensive in Greece. In Vietnam, where the crossed fingers are believed to mimic female genitalia, the gesture of crossing your fingers for good luck is considered indecent.
Learn more about non-verbal communication here:
brainly.com/question/10478535
#SPJ4
Perjuangan diplomasi, perjuangan melalui jalur negosiasi
Perjuangan bersenjata, perjuangan melalui jalur perang
Answer: the court should allow the art collector to testify regarding just the oral agreement for the frame.
Explanation:
Contractual terms that are set forth in a writing intended as a final expression of the parties' agreement cannot be refuted by evidence of any prior agreement or contemporaneous oral agreement. Although this parol evidence rule prohibits contradicting the writing, the terms of the writing may be explained or supplemented by cocurrent additional terms, unless the court finds from all the circumstances that the writing was intended as a complete and exclusive statement of the parties' agreement. To determine whether the parties intended the writing to be the complete and exclusive statement of their agreement, it must be determined whether parties situated as were the parties to this contract would naturally and normally include the extrinsic matter in the writing. Here, the writing at issue states clearly that the painting subject to sale is any painting by Alpha. The art collector's assertion of a prior agreement allowing him to buy a painting by Beta clearly contradicts the terms of the writing. Therefore, the parol evidence rule will render inadmissible testimony as to such an alleged agreement.
