Answer: It is generally taught in the schools that Lichcchavi Period was the Golden Age because of the art and architecture, culture and language, and the socio-political structure the Lichchhavi kings brought.
Explanation:
The answer is purposiveness of behavior.
Edward Tolman is a purposive behaviorist whose work contributed to cognitive learning theory. His theory was called Purposive Behaviorism because he dealt with behaviors that are purposive or goal directed. Behaviors become purposive when an individual seeks something in its environment. The bits of knowledge and cognition gathered while seeking in the environment serve as cognitive maps are used to navigate more and find routes to his goal.
Reliability is the dimension of quality that is shared by both products and services.
Any good or service's natural ability to be compared to other products or services of its kind can be referred to as having quality. The term "quality" has a variety of definitions, but generally speaking, it describes the set of innate characteristics that enable a thing to satisfy explicit or implicit wants.
There are two fundamental qualities: Performance quality gauges how well a good or service lives up to client expectations. If procedures are followed exactly as planned, conformance quality measures are met. Process variability is the underlying cause of quality issues.
To know more about quality refer to: brainly.com/question/3419591
#SPJ4
Answer: Well, Simply, you'd need some type of survival training, let's saying theoretically this world had some equivalent features to earth itself, you'd first need to gather sticks and rocks make a campfire then build a tent out of certain things in the woods, to survive the first night early morning would be the best time to head out and try to find resources or even civilization, if nothing is found, the other way of survival would be to get a large stick and with anything sharp your's want to shape part of the stick to be pointy thus making it a spear and trying to catch fish with it.
Major shifts, that is shifts in the paradigms, are not very frequent - they would make scientific research unstable, as any result of a smaller study could be made invalid by a paradigm shift,
minor changes however are quite common - basically every scientific study adds to the common knowledge and this also can be considered a minor change.
Therefore the best answer is
<span>Major
shifts in scientific views very rarely occur, but minor modifications
of prior knowledge are continually made based on new research.</span>
