Your question should have a picture in other to answer the question:)
Contacting a local hospital and asking them the percentage of the population that has blood type O will generate different results.
The factors that we have to consider why there is differing results are:
1) location of the hospital
2) nationality of their patients
3) number of their patients
I am assuming that the population that question is referring to is the number of patients in the local hospital. The bigger the population, the smaller the effect a unit has on the whole and vice versa.
I read an article that states that 37% of the U.S. population has O+ blood type. These people are usually of Hispanic descent or some Asian descent. So, if a hospital is in a locality that has a majority of Hispanic or Asian patients, its percentage will be higher than a hospital that is located in a Caucasian-populated area.
Aside from Type O+ (most common), blood types also include: O-, A+, A-, B+, B-, AB+, and AB- (rarest blood type)
Answer:
A hypothesis becomes a theory with proper evidence.
Explanation:
A hypothesis is untested and subjective while a theory is tested and objective. A hypothesis will become a theory when it is tested and proven with facts and evidence that support the hypothesis.
In the field of histopathology, the tissues to be observed under the microscope are cut in very thin slices. The thin slices make the tissue transparent, and thus, it becomes easier to observe the internal structures and accurately diagnose a disease. The tissues slices cut for the observation are generally not more than 3 micro meters in their thickness.
Hence, the answer is 'to make the tissues transparent and easier to observe'.
America, Russia or China.
Probably America though.
