Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Answer : The Old lights stressed emotionalism in their preaching ; the New lights did not.
Explanation:
The Old lights refer to the group of people from a split congregation who still believe in the old doctrine while the New lights are the set of people from the same congregation that splits, who embrace the new things or doctrine that were introduced.
The two groups of people can be differentiated by many things , some of them are.
The OLD light-
1 . They are orthodox clergymen that were deeply skeptical of the emotionalism
2. The clergymen condemned the cryings out, fainting and covulsion in revival meetings.
The NEW light-
1. Allow working miracles or speaking with tongues.
2. Allow woman to speak in public and as a preacher.
3. Refused to be silenced no matter the case may be.
<span>under president johnson's reconstruction plan, the south was led by: </span><span>wealthy white planters
These planters were strongly opposing the reconstruction plan because they heavily relied on the Slaves' labor force in order to operate the majority of their plantations.</span>
