1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
trapecia [35]
2 years ago
8

Title VII of the _____________ states that top executives in companies receiving government support can retract bonuses, retenti

on awards, or incentives paid to the top five senior executive officers or the next 20 most highly compensated employees based on corporate information that is later found to be inaccurate.
a. Pay for Performance Act (2009)
b. Equal Pay Act (1963)
c. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (2009)
d. Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002)
History
1 answer:
yanalaym [24]2 years ago
6 0
Title VII of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 states that top executives in companies that received government support can retract bonuses, retention awards paid to the top five (5) senior executive officers or the next twenty (20) most highly compensated employees based on corporate information that is latter found to be inaccurate. Such provisions are done to ensure that correct and appropriate monetary incentives and awards are given to personnel who truly serve and deserves such compensation.
You might be interested in
How did a group of American business leaders, planters, and traders known as the Hawaiian League go outside the law to gain cont
Sholpan [36]

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

They convinced the Minister to send at least 300 marines to "protect" American civilians. But they overthrew the government to retain its Sugar plantations.

5 0
2 years ago
Evaluate the causes of the growth of slavery in thc Americas between 1521 and 1700
erik [133]
Africans were the immigrants to the British New World that had no choice in their destinations or destinies. The first African Americans that arrived in Jamestown in 1619 on a Dutch trading ship were not slaves, nor were they free. They served time as indentured servants until their obligations were complete.
4 0
2 years ago
How does an aristocracy differ from an oligarchy?
Serga [27]
The main way in which aristocracy differs from an oligarchy is that the former is a social class of people, while the latter refers to when a state is ruled by a small elite. 
4 0
2 years ago
why did the 1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance b
stepladder [879]

1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance between local, state and national goverment in the following way

Explanation:

  • The United States moved from dual federalism to cooperative federalism in the 1930s. National programs would increase the size of the national government and may not be the most effective in local environments. Cooperative federalism does not apply to the Judicial branch of the government.
  • Each level of government is dominant within its own sphere. ... Marble cake federalism – Conceives of federalism as a marble cake in which all levels of government are involved in a variety of issues and programs, rather than a layer cake, or dual federalism, with fixed divisions between layers or levels of government.
  • As a theory, dual federalism holds that the federal and state governments both have power over individuals but that power is limited to separate and distinct spheres of authority, and each government is neither subordinate to nor liable to be deprived of its authority by the other.
  • The first, dual federalism, holds that the federal government and the state governments are co-equals, each sovereign. In this theory, parts of the Constitution are interpreted very narrowly, such as the 10th Amendment, the Supremacy Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, and the Commerce Clause
  • The advantages of this system are that it protects local areas and jurisdictions from the overreach of the federal government. The framers of the Constitution were afraid that the federal government would have too much power, and this system was a means of preventing that situation from developing.
  • Historically, the definitive example of dual federalism is the United States. ... These states can check the federal government through judicial action. Europe, too, has a system of dual federalism, albeit set up with state traditions. The European Union (EU) is organized into a federalist government with limited powers.

8 0
2 years ago
In the song “for what it’s worth” what groups were in conflict
dedylja [7]

Younger and older generations.

or

Young People and Old People.

- Apex

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is a push for independence in colonies after world war on
    14·1 answer
  • What was the key purpose of the market days in Philadelphia?
    11·2 answers
  • Identify five consequences of constitutional changes in the new Constitution of Kenya​
    14·1 answer
  • Wat are some of the great things Nelson Mandela king did and wat was the consequence they'd had to go through afterward? Marking
    8·1 answer
  • According to the Urpelainen reading, one of the advantages of the Paris Climate agreement was the use of voluntary national targ
    13·1 answer
  • How did the English Bill of Rights limit the power of the English monarch?
    14·2 answers
  • Helppppp please and thank you
    9·2 answers
  • What could have they done to fix the conflict between palestine and israel?
    7·1 answer
  • Which is not an achievement of the Sumerians?
    6·1 answer
  • Answer the questions in the picture please 100 points if you do
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!